RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.

2010-04-06 Thread Woodrick, Ed
WA4YIH From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 3:55 AM To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll. On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote: and the audio

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.

2010-04-05 Thread Nate Duehr
On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote: and the audio is much better than FM equivalents of IRLP and EchoLink. Ed WA4YIH Not technically possible unless the repeaters are interfaced incorrectly. -- Nate Duehr, WY0X n...@natetech.com

RE: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.

2010-04-04 Thread Woodrick, Ed
Interesting, because that's not what I 've seen. Of course training the users and familiarizing users with the details of the mode is always a big thing that we need to be focused on, and that's one of the reasons why we have the Southeastern Weather Net on Sunday evenings. We have stations

Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Emergency comms poll.

2010-04-03 Thread Tony Langdon
At 07:52 AM 4/4/2010, you wrote: After considerable experience on D-Star nets, both via dplus links and Icom's multiplex facility, and in callsign routed QSO's, I am of the distinct opinion that D-Star communciations are fairly unreliable. Dropped streams are frequent. Folks double on each