on 1/18/01 4:15 PM, Marcus Wigan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Again, what cause for concern? Just how high of a voltage are they calling
>> a safety concern?
>
> mains voltage at 240Volts
>
>> And exactly where do they think this voltage will come
>> from?
>
>
> Cross over on the circui
In a message dated 1/18/01 12:38:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Sorry to sound cynical, and I don't mean to insult anyone's government,
>but
>this seems more like a case of a state-run monopoly being scared to death
>of
>something new (computers/modems) and concocting a feeble excuse to captu
>Again, what cause for concern? Just how high of a voltage are they calling
>a safety concern?
mains voltage at 240Volts
> And exactly where do they think this voltage will come
>from?
Cross over on the circuit boards: there are many (not including Duo I might
add) that still do not meet t
on 1/18/01 9:42 AM, Marcus Wigan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Anybody care to further explain this?? Protect the PSTN network From
>> what?? The high voltage thing is bull
>
>
>
> Unfortunately not necessarily, there are even now a number of 'low
> standard' modems that have circuit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 1/18/01 9:58 AM wrote:
>> The low stadard RJ11 mounted modems work in all countries I have been in
>> (dare I say it also did in UK and Australia when tried), but the dongled
>> version is the approved and authorised connector which is required in
>> countries such as the UK.
At 4:09 PM +1100 1/18/01, Marcus Wigan wrote:
>The low stadrad RJ11 mounted modems wok in all countries I have been in
>(dare I say it also did in UK and Australia when tried), but the dongled
>version is the approved and authorised connector which is required in
>countries such as the UK. In Aust
>Anybody care to further explain this?? Protect the PSTN network From
>what?? The high voltage thing is bull
>Unfortunately not necessarily, there are even now a number of 'low
>standard' modems that have circuit boards that do provide some cause for
>concern. I checked with the testin
on 1/18/01 12:09 AM, Marcus Wigan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The grey box is the authourised connection/isolator required in Australia
> [Canada?] and UK for connection to the PSTN network. In Australia this is
> AUSTEL who authorised and tests such devices. The US has very low standards
>
In a message dated 1/18/01 12:29:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>The low stadard RJ11 mounted modems work in all countries I have been in
>(dare I say it also did in UK and Australia when tried), but the dongled
>version is the approved and authorised connector which is required in
>countries
The reason we don't have it on Canada is all the telecommunication equipment
need to be registered and certified with Industry Canada. You should find a
little sticker on you modem with "maple leaf" on it.
>
> FYI, there is no such authorized connection/isolator required in Canada.
>
> -Laurent.
on 18/01/01 00:09, Marcus Wigan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> --- Neil Heyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ...if US owners have tried the standard Express
>>> Modem in Europe
>>> (especially UK) with success I'd like to hear about
>>> it. I have the
>>> irritating miniDin8 one with the exter
>--- Neil Heyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...if US owners have tried the standard Express
> > Modem in Europe
> > (especially UK) with success I'd like to hear about
> > it. I have the
> > irritating miniDin8 one with the external grey box
> > DAA but my travels take
> > me all sorts of plac
--- Neil Heyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...if US owners have tried the standard Express
> Modem in Europe
> (especially UK) with success I'd like to hear about
> it. I have the
> irritating miniDin8 one with the external grey box
> DAA but my travels take
> me all sorts of places where this
13 matches
Mail list logo
