[Duo2400] Re: running OS X on an upgrade

2000-09-18 Thread Mark Rogers
Probably for many of the same reasons that people want to put System 8.1 on a PB 280c, I would guess. Poke, poke. Hehe. Mark On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:07:59 -0500 Tom Ethen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : Why is everyone so anxious to but this memory hog on : their 2400c, when I is so : limited when

[Duo2400] Re: running OS X on an upgrade

2000-09-18 Thread Tom Ethen
I is (am) limited to memory also (the age thing), but I was refering to the 2400c and the limited amount of memory that can be put into it. Tom Tom Ethen wrote: > Why is everyone so anxious to but this memory hog on their 2400c, when I is so > limited when it comes to memory anyway? > Tom > > ah

[Duo2400] Re: running OS X on an upgrade

2000-09-18 Thread Tom Ethen
Why is everyone so anxious to but this memory hog on their 2400c, when I is so limited when it comes to memory anyway? Tom ahclist wrote: > > > >Do you have any idea wether I will be able to run OSX on my PB2400 > >w/G3@240? > >Can I even get 128Mb RAM into this little box? If the architecture i

[Duo2400] Re: running OS X on an upgrade

2000-09-18 Thread Ed Graf
on 9/18/00 7:26 AM, ahclist at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No... :( Early release information states that ten will not run on the > upgrade cards. But until someone tests it, we won't know whether this is > Apple taking their conservative approach to compatibility or there is an > issue with RO

[Duo2400] Re: running OS X on an upgrade

2000-09-18 Thread ahclist
> >Do you have any idea wether I will be able to run OSX on my PB2400 >w/G3@240? >Can I even get 128Mb RAM into this little box? If the architecture in here >is, as I've been led to believe, basically just a 3400, will that ever be >supported? > >Questions, questions: any help you could give woul