ii taggi
wmii.suckless.org -> wmii taggi
sic.suckless.org-> sic taggi
st.suckless.org -> st taggi
Sorry for any inconvenience. But the multiple domains got messy
and expensive during the time...
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
ince me either. I think it's time to write slock in
50 lines of code.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:26:39PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 05:15:56PM +0200, Matthias Diener wrote:
> > how does it fit into your philosophy to use a blown up application like
> > xlock to just locking your screen :-)
> > xtrlock is less than
.
>
> http://thorntwig.se/slock-bsdsp.diff
Thanks I applied it. One remark, you have a typo in that patch
(sp->sp_pwdb instead of sp->sp_pwdp)...
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
roblems I had with zoom and
> window sizes and the resize functions works in a more intuitive way
> now.
> It looks like you have problems getting my files from Julian's page,
> so I'm attaching the patch to this message (arg: may I ask for a hg
> repository for dwm patches?).
Ye
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Cedric Krier wrote:
> Here is a patch to add check for all user's groups instead of only the
> real group.
How portable is that? Can some BSD user check please?
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2006-10-12 18:02:43 +0200):
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Cedric Krier wrote:
> > > Here is a patch to add check for all user's groups instead of only the
> > >
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:08:59AM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2006-10-13 10:53:21 +0200):
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:45:17AM +0200, Jukka Salmi wrote:
> > > Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2006-10-12 18:02:43 +0200):
> > > > On Thu, Oct
implemented originally for wmii
(swarp was wmiiwarp, sselp was wmiipsel, and ssid was wmiisetsid).
libixp-0.1 won't be released before wmii-3.5.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:31:51AM +0200, Anthony Brown wrote:
> Just out of curiousity. When do you use swarp?
I don't use it, but those owning a multihead setup might use it.
At least it is much simplier than xwarppointer.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< htt
.
complaining about a push).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
I created slock-0.2 which grabs the mouse pointer now:
http://suckless.org/download/slock-0.2.tar.gz
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
t; AlreadyGrabbed.
>
> what I'm doing wrong?
I removed the busy grabbing loop from slock. I should readd it
with attempting it 10 times at maximum with usleep(1000) in each
iteration. Thanks for the hint.
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:06:58PM +0400, Alex Elide wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 02:05:33PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > I removed the busy grabbing loop from slock. I should readd it
> > with attempting it 10 times at maximum with usleep(1000) in each
> > iteration
ncrease the usleep() to
usleep(10); and recheck.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
Mod1-Return press
WinKey-Return...
If that launches a terminal as well there is something broken.
Despite of that, check if toggling NumLock or ScrollLock has any
different effects.
After all, dwm/wmii should have no effect on all keys which
aren't passively grabbed in combination wit
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:42:12PM +0930, Stephen Caraher wrote:
> On 11:03, Wed 25 Oct 06, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:24:13PM +0930, Stephen Caraher wrote:
> > > After I start dwm or wmii, I have a problem where the window manager
> > > appe
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:13:52PM +0930, Stephen Caraher wrote:
> On 16:35, Wed 25 Oct 06, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > Since you get no KeyPress events, I suspect there is something broken. Check
> > if it works without your .Xmodmap.
>
> It doesn't work, with or witho
Hi there,
I created two new releases which fix the argv handling. They
can be downloaded from:
http://irc.suckless.org/download/sic-0.5.tar.gz
http://tools.suckless.org/download/dmenu-1.4.tar.gz
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
h xev which key symbol is reported when
pressing those special keys).
And next time recheck such behavior with the default config.h
first, to make sure it is not related to your config.h.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 12:34:39AM +0930, Stephen Caraher wrote:
> On 13:33, Thu 26 Oct 06, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> The special keys are the multimedia keys on the front of the Dell Inspiron
> 6000 laptop, and they don't by default map to any keysyms, only keycodes --
> which I n
nt to make fully sure it works correct.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:19:33PM +0100, Thomas Tretzmüller wrote:
> snapping works and is a nice addition - but windows cannot be moved
> beyond the right and bottom edges of the screen anymore, only at top
> and left.
That's fixed in hg tip already.
--
Anselm R. Gar
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:00:05PM +0100, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >I implemented a snap-to-screen-border feature for mouse-based
> >movements of clients in floating mode (or floating clients)
/* pixels */
to your config.h if you upgrade from dwm-1.9.
In my new 1920x1200 display, I use 40px for SNAPping.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
://suckless.org/download/dwm-2.1.tar.gz
Thanks to Gottox for this simplificiation proposal.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><>< http://suckless.org/~arg/ ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361
Hi there,
I created a new release of slock, the simple screen locker:
http://suckless.org/download/slock-0.3.tar.gz
This release grants that suid is only used while fetching the
password records.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Hi there, sorry for spaming these lists with this OT issue, but
I hope someone out there also owns a T43 (IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad),
if so please send me a privmail, I have an important question
about it...
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
the focus state, which means the
focused client (which does not present such a titlebar).
Actually the client area already presents what the window is all
about.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
> have to focus the window to read the info rather than just glancing.
Well that is a good point I can agree on, also the point running
multiple vi windows is accecptable. Let's keep it, it doesn't
hurts too much, and those who don't like it can easily remove
the specific code.
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:51:17AM +0100, Jonas Pfenniger wrote:
> Why not introduce a new flag in the config.h ? It shouldn't take more than
> 5LOC
No, the motivation was only to get rid of some code, not to add
some ;) Anyway, the titlebars are a stayer.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Ga
vanish from focused windows as
> usual. See:
>
> http://mosey.org/images/2006/titlebar_idea.jpg
Such indicator would be of lesser use in my eyes. If one chooses
a sane color scheme, the 1px indicator border is quite visible,
look at this shot:
http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20061
efer a
shortcut key to force focusing the main window and the start moving around.
Just my 2 cents.
saludos,
--
Julián
- End forwarded message -
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
e
> mentions something about a "broken pipe" having to do
> with gdm on Linux but I assume therz no such thing on
> a Mac. Any ideas?
Just run dwm in a way documented in README file to make sure to
supply input. Actually OSX seems to close stdout of the parent
process on fork() (like *
m not suscribed to the list, currently i read the archives.
--
gualteri (at) rootshell.be/~gualteri
- End forwarded message -
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
ut my second point?)
If you want to check, how it feels without titlebars, you can
apply my patch for dwm-2.2 (and hg tip):
http://suckless.org/download/dwm-2.2-notitlebar.patch
(It removes abot 70 LOC and renames drawtitle into drawclient,
which sould be done anyway).
Regards,
--
Ansel
gt; having to
> search through all tags (rather than just non-empty ones)
> if I forget where something is, but it also
That's interesting, I think I adapt that ;)
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:42:13PM +, David Tweed wrote:
> My coding style isn't great, but if you want something that
> works to try it and see if you actually like it in practice,
> attatched is the patch to draw.c cheers, dave tweed
I pushed a slightly different version.
UTF8 titles).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
will zoom it in all tags it is
tagged - when viewed. But to me this seems more natural after
all.
Actually I pushed this thing, it removes 40 lines, check hg tip
if you like it ;)
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:11PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 11/22/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Actually my favorit 'solution' to this problem would be,
> >dropping the weights at all and don't touching the global client
> >or
loating clients.
However, you could add following function and shortcut it:
extern void tilemax(Arg *arg);
void
maxtiled(Arg *arg) {
arrange = dofloat;
arrange();
zoom(arg);
}
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:27:47PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > > * Leonhard Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061122 16:18]:
> > &g
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:27:47PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> >
pand the code.
If you check hg tip, you'll notice that the source is smaller
than in dwm-2.2 ;)
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:44:15PM +0100, Leonhard Scherer wrote:
> Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 03:35:38PM +0100, Leonhard Scherer wrote:
> >
> >>What I want to say is this:
> >>Don't blow up the code of DWM; why don't you just
Hi there,
I created http://suckless.org/download/dwm-2.3.tar.gz
This release contains the occupied tag indicator and reverts
arrange() to the reoder()-less arrangement of clients in the
global client list (which makes the source code simplier and
smaller).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe ><
your patch on monday to the central repository.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
))
> return;
This code sets c to the top client in the stack, if the selected
client (sel) is zoomed and tiled. It is executed whenever zoom()
is called on a zoom()'ed tiled client.
nexttiled(clients) returns the first tiled client (which
appears in the master).
Regard
stext[r-(stext[r-1]=='\n'?1:0)] = '\0';
> + for(p=stext+strlen(stext)-1;p>stext &&
> *p!='\n';--p);
> + if(p>stext)
> + strncpy(stext, p+1,
> sizeof(stext));
> }
> drawstatus();
> }
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
avoids such weird patches to implement tagandview or
maxtiled stuff and other things - with 3 additional LOC only.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
t for maintaining multiplexer functions
is higher than touching config.h once and stick with it.
Also, this results in patches which are patches actually, and not
only such a sequence function.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:06:10PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> No, you don't need to change, if you define NFUNCS 5, you can
> keep {zoom}, the compiler is smart enough that it NULL's the
> rest of the struct.
^^array.
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://
to the rest of dwm.
What do others think about the change?
Anyone likes the change? If not, I'd consider removing it
again...
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 07:47:04PM +0300, Alex Elide wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:31:14PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > > On 11/27/06, Enno Gottox Boland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>
> Old:
>
> typedef struct {
> unsigned long mod;
> KeySym keysym;
> void (*func)(Arg *arg);
> Arg arg;
> } Key;
^^
This is 'New' again,
ined, but
looping 100 times is nearly nothing compared to what goes on
during arrange() ;)
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 11:54:37AM -0500, Ricardo Lanziano wrote:
> * Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-27 17:31:14 +0100]:
> > What do others think about the change?
> > Anyone likes the change? If not, I'd consider removing it
> > again...
> The chan
for it, so don't expect such
behavior in mainstream dwm.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 02:17:15PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> * Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061128 14:13]:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 05:57:33AM +0300, dmtry wrote:
> > > i'm not a programmer, but dwm is very useful for me.
> > > Please he
for such stuff there is the fnord tag which can be
toggled in and out, only for some seconds on demand, eg through
right clicking the specific tag or pressing M-C-tag.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
hank all people which are involved in this project and
contributed so many and useful things!
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
ne
> walk through full client list, so adding an additional scan here and there
> doesn't
> change asymptotic complexity.
This is an interesting idea, however, since it only works
predictable for singly-viewed tags, I don't consider this for
mainstream dwm.
Regards,
--
Anselm
ed with the
new tag.
With this in mind one could get rid of all MODKEY-
shortcuts and replace them with MODKEY-Ctrl-,
the way dwm works would be more tagging-alike.
What do you think?
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
until a tag is selected again. However, I
think it will be rare that one untoggles all tags.
See attached patch to check it live.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
diff -r c4ecdb5500f6 config.arg.h
--- a/config.arg.h Thu Nov 30 09:19:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:00:36PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:54:20AM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> >> I know, but where do these windows go in the meantime? Are they on
> >&
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:16:13PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:00:36PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:54:20AM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> >
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:36:09PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Gottox, after all I think, there is no need to change anything,
> >except your shortcuts. I don't think that toggleview() needs the
>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:42:25PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 12:36:09PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 11/30/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Gottox, after all I think, there is no need to change anything,
> > &
hings will stay like they are. I
believe I should really concentrate on st now ;)
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
bset" effect.
One would need some mark() function, so that tag-based things like
toggletag() and tag() would have effect on such a set instead.
But I think it would mean overhead, because if I go to mark() a
client I can already tag() it differently, so the concept would
get more complex...
ing as minimalistic as dwm?
Yes, define a rule for such apps, that they go to the 'crap' tag
or something similiar. (look into config.arg.h how I handle
firefox, it doesn't interrup my workflow when I don't view the
'net' tag during startup).
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
ke
(which is somewhat like sticky in other WMs).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
e
> something more different from the client-tag dots.
I noticed the same and got an idea, will present it tomorrow!
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
hence X should cache all keypresses it gets
during this time until readstdin(); finishes. If not, then blame
X or fork().
On the other hand I also agree that using a program list cache
is wise.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:28:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:01:15AM +1300, Karl. wrote:
> > I wondered if the tag-used indicator could be an underline instead, to
> > reduce the load on my aging brain? Or something else, maybe - I'm not
&
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:51:17AM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:28:01PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 08:01:15AM +1300, Karl. wrote:
> > > I wondered if the tag-used indicator could be an underline instead, to
> >
well though...
Here we go what hg tip contains:
http://www.suckless.org/shots/proposal_hgtip.png
I think 1px border is fully sufficient, look at the shot, this
is hg tip now.
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 11:12:34AM +0100, Oliver Heins wrote:
> "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here we go what hg tip contains:
> > http://www.suckless.org/shots/proposal_hgtip.png
> > I think 1px border is fully sufficient, look at the shot,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think 1px border is fully sufficient, look at the shot, this
> >is hg tip now.
>
> Even on high resolutions? I can imagine the border gets
vorize this pseudo-3d approach).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:10:54PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I think 1px border is fully sufficient, look at the shot, this
> > &g
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:28:08PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 12:16):
>
> > Nah, the complete border sucks, if you have adjacent borders
> > (they make a 2px think border, which looks ugly. That's why I
>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 12:31):
>
> > > Hey, how about resigning from the pseudo-3d approach (which is really
> > > remotely detached from the aesthetics o
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:43:14PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > > > http://antoszka.ath.cx/s.png
> > >
> > > Dunno, this is my current proposal:
> > > http://www.suckless.org/shots/final_indicator.png
> > >
> > > (now with some black
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:03:17PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Well this is my last proposal:
> >http://www.suckless.org/shots/final2.png
> >
> >Maybe the best if one considers, that a user might
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 15:07):
>
> > http://www.suckless.org/shots/compromise.png
> >
> > This is the compromise, less obtrusive, still fairly different
> > a
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:26:22PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> >> Making a release?
> >
> >No, let's wait some days... This chan
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:53:45PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:26:22PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:59:35AM -0600, Seth Graham wrote:
> Sander van Dijk wrote:
> >On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> >>> Making a release?
> >>
> &
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:59:35AM -0600, Seth Graham wrote:
> > Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > >On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 17:06):
>
> > > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots was
> > > extremely confusing. I think if I were implemen
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 17:06):
> >
> > > > I think the line is a better idea than the
And the winner is:
http://www.suckless.org/shots/winner.png
(Oh I was lame today... ;))
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
moving it one pixel up-leftwards).
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 07:30:24PM -0600, Kurt Maier wrote:
> On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:59:35AM -0600, Seth Graham wrote:
> >> > Sa
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 01:57:40PM +0100, Stefan Tibus wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 12:17:26 +0300 Dmitry Belitsky wrote:
> > yeah, this solution - the best,
> > and thank you.
> > :)
> >
> > On 01/12/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
or the tags are useless and strcmp should
> be used instead.
>
> Here's my patch for 2.5.
Stupid error of me (the !matched). Agreed, applied in hg tip.
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
client stack (snext)
Regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
1 - 100 of 1210 matches
Mail list logo
