Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-05-20, 10:04):
> Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
> and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
> are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
> dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be techni
Mate Nagy dixit (2009-05-15, 20:29):
[...]
> no way related to each other. Even if someone writes a really small,
> elegant, suckless editor core, it will be unusable until:
> - it gets encoding handling right (internal, file, terminal)
> - word wrapping (disabled, enabled, soft, hard...)
> -
Thanos Zygouris dixit (2009-05-04, 11:38):
> As far i know, DWM doesn't support xft fonts...or does it?
There was a lenghty discussion on that a few days ago. Please search the
archives.
In short, currently it does not (without external patches). It may in a
future.
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:
Amit Uttamchandani dixit (2009-05-01, 12:39):
>
> I don't have a powerful machine so using OpenOffice was out of the
> question. I was happily using gnumeric for sometime but this bug just
> killed it for me:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526379
>
> I know this will proba
Wu, Yue dixit (2009-04-30, 14:53):
> > It's part of the main Xorg distribution, so I don't think it's
> > unreasonable to expect people to have it.
>
> Some others haven't... It's just a simple function, if I have no xsetroot
> installed, and I like this function, I have to install a tool that's
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-04-27, 13:54):
> "$subject is broken, therefore we must bloat up dwm to work around it"
> is bad reasoning, even if $subject is "x11 font rendering" or "some
> expensive app my school is forcing on me"
The only difference is that you *have* to use X11 font rendering while
Mate Nagy dixit (2009-04-26, 17:01):
> However, I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
> not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
> you);
This is a very selfish view. 8-bit character sets suck big way, even not
considering anything outside accent
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2009-04-24, 00:00):
> On 4/23/09, pmarin wrote:
> > Try the last version of Dillo2. It is starting to support CSS and in
> > the next version (Dillo 2.1) will support keybinding.
>
> dillo used to be nice.. until it started using c++
> i'd rather use the tcl/tk html viewer,
Lorenzo Bolla dixit (2009-04-20, 15:07):
> ifconfig and dhclient?
Those two don't really deal with the wireless layer of 802.11 (though
ifconfig does in some OS'es to an extent).
--
[a]
pgpWqdxUrlr8y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Preben Randhol dixit (2009-04-20, 15:52):
> This is somewhat off-topic. I'm totally new to using wireless network. At
> home everything is wired, but i have sometimes the need to use wireless
> when traveling. Now I have an Asus Eee so I can connect. Only problem is
> that the gui tool of xfce4 (o
Bartosz Nitkiewicz dixit (2009-04-17, 09:52):
> Enno Boland (Gottox) pisze:
> > What are tag events? Never heard of it.
> >
> > 2009/4/17, Bartosz Nitkiewicz :
> > > I'm wondering how to set up tag events. I had this feature before, but
> > > suddenly disappeared.
> I am not too good at English
Alan Busby dixit (2009-03-13, 14:59):
> For all the mutt users,
> I imagine most are doing (fetchmail -> procmail -> mutt) right?
That's right.
For outgoing mail I use a postfix configuration with sender-based
routing to a number of smarthosts (one for each of my accounts) with TLS
and auth whic
Christoph Lohmann dixit (2009-03-12, 10:13):
> 1. Window Manager = DWM
> 2. File Manager = Microsoft Explorer
> 3. Text Editor = Microsoft Visual Studio
> 4. Calendar / Todo = SAP
> 5. File search = local Google mirror
> 6. SCM = Microsoft Visual Studio
> 7. E-Mail = Microsoft Outlook
> 8. Music =
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34):
> Hi,
>
> I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> is in the view, reasons:
>
> - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(),
> if n is the number of cli
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-02-19, 14:14):
> Delta dixit (2009-02-19, 14:09):
>
> > Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I
> > am on a meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen? I
> > think nobody ta
Delta dixit (2009-02-19, 14:09):
> Does someone know an easy way to make slock print a message (like "I
> am on a meeting" or "I'll be back at 17:00") over its black screen? I
> think nobody talk about this in the list and it seems to me that it
> would be a good functionality.
AFAIK, there's a
Evgeny Grablyk dixit (2009-02-09, 23:32):
> Antoni Grzymala wrote:
>> Evgeny Grablyk dixit (2009-02-09, 23:02):
>>
>>
>>> I just downloaded dwm-5.4.1 and noticed that stdin-to-statusbar output
>>> mechanism was removed. Sadly, I don't seem to rememb
Evgeny Grablyk dixit (2009-02-09, 23:02):
> I just downloaded dwm-5.4.1 and noticed that stdin-to-statusbar output
> mechanism was removed. Sadly, I don't seem to remember any discussion about
> that. Was there any? If not, what are the reasons for this removal?
Bumped into the same problem tod
Jeremy Jay dixit (2009-01-27, 16:48):
> I always try to do this and get frustrated when I remember it doesn't
> work, but today I actually looked up the man pages and found out how
> easy it is to get dmenu to support filename tab-completion. This patch
> adds a small function that completes a fi
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2008-12-09, 19:44):
> If you consider that Neale's patch makes it upstream, what do you think about:
>
> while true
> do
> dwm
> done
>
> in .xinitrc to restart dwm?
How do I exit back to xdm cleanly then?
--
[a]
Scytrin dai Kinthra dixit (2008-12-10, 12:14):
> Hate to make this a support thread, but are you sure there's no support?
> I was able to get my webcam on my t61 working using v4l and the ulw?
> drivers for webcams.
> The fingerprint reader I got working as well as a usable alternative
> for pam a
Carlos Pita dixit (2008-09-29, 17:18):
> pixels. I came up to two different solutions:
>
> 1) toggle the bar visible if urgent hint is set for any client.
>
> 2) hack manage() to show (g)xmessages floating bottom right without
> stealing focus.
>
> I'd implemented both variants with relative ea
Claudio dixit (2008-09-29, 01:05):
> { "Amsn", NULL, NULL, 1<<1, True },
This is a bit off topic, but writing 2 instead of 1<<1 might save you
some typing next time :).
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Donald Chai dixit (2008-09-11, 22:34):
> Just specify multiple font patterns in config.h, separated by commas:
>
> static const char font[] =
> "-*-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-*-*-*,-*-ukai-*-r-normal--*-*-*-*-*-*"
> ;
What does this syntax actually mean? Does it mean that X will l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit (2008-09-09, 09:31):
> what is client switching for you? Which keys are you using? If youre
> talking about the default zoom and alt,tab keys. In dwm theres no
> random functionailty,but you can make a patch if you want :P. Check
> your conf and feed us with more concise in
Matthias-Christian Ott dixit (2008-09-05, 17:16):
> > An easy fix is grabbing the X server until the mouse release. I did
> > this once, but decided against it since your scenario is at least less
> > frequent in my own use case ;)
> >
> > Another possibility would be to go the old wmi way of dra
hiro dixit (2008-09-05, 15:58):
> right today i came back late in the morning after a lot of free
> soublaki and retsina and in my bed I booted my x60s, probably to check
/me envies the souvlaki and retsina...
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hiro dixit (2008-09-05, 15:03):
> > Well give it a try in some shop and I bet you will judge it
> > differently then. I also thought exactly the same about such small pcs
> > that they are unusable and wasted money, but now I think I was wrong
> > after having tested one...
> >
> > Kind regards,
>
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2008-09-05, 10:28):
> What do people think about such an EEE PC as low budget option to run
> dwm on? Any experiences already if the screen is big enough for daily
> work? I had an opportunity yesterday to try one, and I must admit I'm
> keen to order one. The keyboard and ke
Chris Monson dixit (2008-08-30, 13:55):
> > > You are using Apache? Shame on you ;). Seriously Apache is definitively
> > > not suckless.
> >
> > (: propose something less sucker, please. I'll take a look.
>
>
> lighttpd - definitely sucks less
Seems to be a bit of an urban legend. Both resour
yy dixit (2008-08-23, 18:09):
> In my opinion, moving the seltags definition to config.h would be the
> right thing to do. This way, with the right mouse and keys
> configuration you could achieve things like, for example, having a tag
> always visible. It is not something I'm gonna use myself, bu
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2008-08-18, 09:32):
> So I have to repeat what I told several times: try to find a proper
> font configuration if you need support for special character sets or
> fallback to a non-UTF-8 locale if you are CJK user or maybe if
> cyrillic glyphs are your favorite alphabet.
So
Станислав dixit (2008-08-07, 12:35):
> Hello!
> How can I unsubscribe from this maillist?
Really, Stanislav, we don't need the whole digest quoted to actually
help you with that question.
http://www.suckless.org/common/community.html
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Slava S. Kardakov dixit (2008-08-07, 02:03):
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14467 Doesn't help?
Yeah, I've been using patched XLC_LOCALE for a long time. Doesn't quite
help.
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2008-08-06, 23:28):
> Christian Garbs dixit (2008-08-06, 22:42):
>
> > I'm still using dwm-4.7 and with the following two patches everything
> > is alright for me (should be applicable to current dwm, too):
> >
> > http://www.cgarbs.de
Christian Garbs dixit (2008-08-06, 22:42):
> I'm still using dwm-4.7 and with the following two patches everything
> is alright for me (should be applicable to current dwm, too):
>
> http://www.cgarbs.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/dwm-mitch.git?a=blob;f=05_patch_dwm_mitch_utf8widechars.diff
> http://www.
Claudio dixit (2008-08-06, 19:29):
> I had a similar problem by upgrading to dwm-4.9 from dwm-4.7.
> I solved it by restoring the old font from dwm-4.7. To me, it's a
> font stuff anyway. HTH.
Happens both with misc-fixed and terminus. And, as has been shown in the
last screenshot, identically sp
Kurt H Maier dixit (2008-08-06, 09:26):
> What's your locale setup?
$ locale
LANG=
LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-
Kurt H Maier dixit (2008-08-06, 08:58):
> Make sure the font you're using with dmenu supports UTF-8 and is
> properly configured to use it
Obviously. Other characters wouldn't display correctly if the font
weren't UTF-aware (and correctly configured).
Have a look at this screenshot (xterm with t
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2008-08-06, 09:55):
> http://theka.tk/fuckup-1.png
http://theka.tk/fuckup-2.png <= correction.
[a]
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
there seems to be some inconsistent utf-8 handling id dwm's and dmenu's
text render code.
Problems illustrated below:
http://theka.tk/fuckup-0.png
http://theka.tk/fuckup-1.png
And as you can see on:
http://theka.tk/fuckup-1.png
text gets returned by dmenu correctly (which probably isn't m
Antony Jepson dixit (2008-08-02, 14:53):
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but is the purpose of the monocle layout simply
> to make dwm more manageable for people with multiple screens?
I'd rather say it's very useful on small screens. I have it as default
layout on my 8,9" HP Mini-note and seldom use
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-07-31, 18:42):
> 'Makefiles are inherently evil as well. Anybody who has worked on them
> for any time has run into the dreaded tab problem. "Is my command not
> executing because I have a space in front of my tab?!!" said the
> original author of Ant way too many times.'
Mate Nagy dixit (2008-07-31, 13:49):
> (ideally, everybody should use something modern instead of C (like
> Haskell (which I don't actually really know, so don't attack me :)),
> but that's not going to happen. Oh, and Lisp, of course. This is 2008,
> people, there are plenty of languages that c
Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-07-29, 21:04):
> > Mod1-t (tiled)
> > Mod1-f (floating)
> > Mod1-m (monocle)
>
> Just because I'm curious: Am I the only one using readline (shell, etc.)
> with Emacs key bindings and am therefore always remapping/deleting some
> default dwm key bindings?
I'm very fond of
Kurt H Maier dixit (2008-07-29, 07:36):
> I approve of deliberate elitism, and the dwm/suckless community is
> justifiably arrogant because they use better software than other
> people.
>
> I see no reason to redact statements just because some whiners think
> everything on the internet should be
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2008-07-29, 09:44):
> Well, I removed this statement, now. It was on purpose 2 years ago,
> though. It wasn't intended as offense, however.
>
> I might restore this statement, if a new user shows up proposing or
> asking for a configuration file format.
How about adding a d
Mate Nagy dixit (2008-07-29, 09:58):
>> "This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid
>> questions."
> i wholeheartedly support these words.
>> Please discuss about removing, or altering that.
>> The reason is, that I met people who thought, that the dwm-/suckle
Alex Matviychuk dixit (2008-07-18, 12:13):
> Thanks for the great explanation. The masking bit makes sense now,
> however, I'm still having trouble with the behavior.
>
> xprop reads as follows:
>
> WM_CLASS(STRING) = "stalonetray", "stalonetray"
[...]
Hi, I came across a similar bug today, wh
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-06-18, 12:51):
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:48:38PM +1000, Jessta wrote:
> > I'm running dwm-4.2(probably should upgrade, but anyway)
> > I just installed the new version of firefox-3.0 and it seems to start
> > shaking(like it's struggling to resize) whenever I open a
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-06-13, 11:10):
> > I feel the need for a image resize program that matches the
> > Unix and suckless philosophy.
>
> image resize is a non-trivial task
> (there are many possible filters with different characteristics)
>
> also saving an image in a lossy format (.jpg) w
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-05-17, 16:05):
> - removed reapply()
[...]
> Let me know how welcome do you feel about those changes. Bug
> reports are also welcome.
I'm not sure removing reapply() and forcing people to restart dwm is a
neat idea for those using logon managers. Quitting dwm ends my
Archie Elberling dixit (2008-05-15, 10:48):
Your [webmail server's?] clock is wrong. Your e-mail was sent from the
future (see the attribution time).
> H. Interesting - although it doesn't look like dietlinux has really
> been maintained over the past few years. dietlibc has though, so perhap
hiro dixit (2008-05-07, 19:59):
> argh. Can you please stop with that semi-solutions and even more
> stupid compile time options to suit all people??? go buy that stuff
> from apple or microsoft. I'm sure it will suit a lot more people than
Thank you very much for your kind suggestion, I am alrea
John A. Grahor dixit (2008-05-07, 17:57):
>> Having to use the mouse a lot can suck, but following Fitts' Law makes
>> it suck /significantly/ less, in my opinion. It might seem like it'd be
>> bad to not be able to move a window partially off-screen, but I don't
>> think I've ever intentionally m
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-05-05, 20:58):
> > I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
>
> -1
>
> i personally don't use multihead
> keep the code clean
I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have ti
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I
> > have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff.
> > what's the correct way?
>
> DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0
Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-28, 10:57):
> > No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though.
>
> Cool.
> What I'm missing right now in hg tip is Bar=Off but maybe it's
> achievable via the new geom settings.
Yeah,1122 is the last OldWorld dwm (by mac analogy), and I'm sticking
with it for now
Tuncer Ayaz dixit (2008-04-27, 21:49):
> Btw, what about the Tk issues I read here IIRC a long time ago?
> Are there any problem with Tk 8.5?
No I'm not noticing any. I'm using hg 1122, though.
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
markus schnalke dixit (2008-04-24, 08:37):
> Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Sander dixit (2008-04-24, 01:27):
> >
> > Which, in my case, is mapped to the control-key
>
> so you're probably an emacs user ;-9
> vi friends would ma
Martin Sander dixit (2008-04-24, 01:27):
> I like pancake's idea (but I don't have a clue what bloq.mayus is).
Caps lock.
Which, in my case, is mapped to the control-key, as caps-lock is a key I
used probably about three times in my life, everytime by accident.
Always made me wonder, why such a
Enno Gottox Boland dixit (2008-04-23, 16:27):
> think of alt+tab. btw. There's a switch to prevent rdesktop from grabbing
> keys:
>
>-K Do not override window manager key bindings. By default
> rdesktop attempts to grab all keyboard input when it is in
> focus.
I kno
Enno Gottox Boland dixit (2008-04-23, 15:35):
> > Which brings another question to mind on a related topic:
> >
> > Is it possible to prevent applications to receive dwm-specific
> > keystrokes upon focusing them? My particular problem is that I often
> > work on remote Windows machines via rd
Premysl Hruby dixit (2008-04-23, 14:27):
> > Maybe we can also let configurable this bloq. key in config.h and
> > use any other locked key for this.
>
> I prefer to use Mod4 (win key) as MODKEY, so I have no keybinding clash.
Agreed, mod4 is far more comfortable.
Which brings another question
pancake dixit (2008-04-11, 12:00):
> Does anyone has written or knows a minimalistic forum system in cgi or php?
Don't touch PHP even with a stick. It gives you intestine cancer and
contributes to global warming or a new ice age (whichever is your
option).
There's a minimalist Ruby on Rails foru
Enno Gottox Boland dixit (2008-04-10, 11:27):
> l33tness?! - l33tness sucks.
>
> I think sort | uniq is more unixy and therefor better :)
Yeah, I was making fun of l33tness in case you didn't notice :)
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-04-10, 11:02):
> actually 'sort | uniq' is not (much) slower
> (at least i couldn't measure any difference on my linux setup)
Yeah, but it's got a negative l33tness factor and uses up four more
bytes in writing not mentioning the evil forking :).
--
[a]
signature.asc
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-04, 11:35):
> Well what about having monocle work like this:
>
> just only raise and display the focused client in the monocle
> area, and restore the previous dimensions everytime a new client
> is focused? But still working on all clients of course.
I think we al
Marc Andre Tanner dixit (2008-04-02, 15:37):
> Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>> What about getting rid of supporting the selection of multiple
>> tags at a time and celebrating the revival of the column layout
>> of wmii again in dwm 5.0? What about getting rid of all the tiled
>> layout flavors in favor
Samuel Baldwin dixit (2008-03-23, 22:03):
> > Perhaps you were thinking about stumpwm [1]? Since it's running in a
> > live Common Lisp REPL it's probably easily controllable from within
> > emacs (and what not).
>
> If you're actually looking for a similar but usable WM, check out
> ratpoison. I
John S. Yates, Jr. dixit (2008-03-23, 17:58):
> I have some vague recollection of someone posting a library for emacs
> to control a tiling WM. I thought that that WM was dwm. Googling
> around, even substituting wmii, awesome, xmonad, etc I have found no
> trace of such a beast. Am I simply mi
hiro dixit (2008-03-08, 09:30):
> this is not this unix convention's purpose.
> I don't see any use of that feature in dmenu. You could always write a
> wrapper around it, if you so want have case insensitivity so badly.
If you had read our mails carefully you'd find out we *don't* want this
fea
Sander van Dijk dixit (2008-03-08, 14:35):
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dmenu is case sensitive here and works as expected, are you running some
> > exotic OS?
>
> No. Considering that dmenu uses strncasecm
Sander van Dijk dixit (2008-03-08, 14:20):
> 1. Case insensitive string matching should be optional; right now,
> when I have an entry 'Foo' and an entry 'foo', I can't put the cursor
> on 'foo' without using the arrow keys, not even when I type exactly
> 'foo'. Quite annoying. While I understand
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-03-06, 23:23):
> On 3/6/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I also refactored tile(), which consists of 5 functions now,
> > tilev(), tileh(), tilemaster(), tilevstack(), tilehstack().
> > Due to the change yesterday, I believe that with some testing
> > an
hiro dixit (2008-03-05, 17:02):
> And regarding firefox: I tried to print ten pages from firefox
> yesterday. It slowly grew to 200mb in ram, and used all the cpu power,
> before i killed it and instantly installed opera. Congratulations to
> firefox and all those oss fine arts suckers.
I totally
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-03-05, 21:16):
> > I use it vimperator occasionally with firefox and consider it an
> > excellent piece of software :). If only firefox weren't such a bloat, I
> > would happily start using it as my main browser.
>
> iirc there is a nice feature of listing the urls of a
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-03-05, 20:44):
> On 3/5/08, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not using vimperator? :)
>
> off topic
>
> pff
> vimperator didn't even have any usable navigation last time i checked
Actually I'm using Opera as
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-03-05, 20:14):
> And here is my setup in action (btw. my dwm has 28000 bytes as
> binary):
>
> http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-4.8-xinerama.png
Not using vimperator? :)
Sad to see so much space wasted for the useless firefox widgets.
Best,
--
[a]
signatu
Jeremy O'Brien dixit (2008-03-05, 13:27):
> Off topic slightly, but could you possibly share your screenrc? I like
> the layout at the bottom. :-D
Sure, I'll just post it inline:
escape ^gg
deflogin on
shell -/bin/bash
altscreen on
defscrollback 4096
nethack on
defut
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2008-03-05, 19:13):
> Here's a shot (see the top-left corner) with relevant xwininfo:
> http://tkabber.tk/firefox.png
http://theka.tk/firefox.png
Sorry about the screwup.
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi guys,
I already asked on IRC, but the ML may be more appropriate for the
problem. This concerns very recent builds of firefox-current
(3.0_pre_blabla).
Since a few days it has been exhibiting very strange behaviour with dwm.
I get a tiny one-pixel-wide and 19-pixels-tall omnipresent window. No
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-02-26, 22:17):
> I'd like to get rid of regexp matching in rules, any complains?
> Does anyone really uses them?
I think I just use substring match. Will this be sufficient?
Best,
--
[a]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Amit Uttamchandani dixit (2008-02-25, 13:44):
> I had to set up solaris 10 on an old sun workstation that we have. I gotta
> admit this is quite an impressive release (in terms of technology, ease of
> installation, etc.)
>
> Anyways that aside. I had to read up on the Solaris 10 install guide
Joerg van den Hoff dixit (2008-02-14, 13:53):
> I only see this with `xterm'. `urxvt' behaves more benign. and
> is a much nicer terminal emulator (smaller, faster, unicode support, etc.)
> than `xterm' in my opinion.
xterm also supports unicode and has a number of unique features (albeit
rarely
Alexander Polakov dixit (2008-02-10, 03:33):
> > The previous email made me wonder, as I always thought I don't have
> > problems with displaying UTF-8 characters with the bitmat font (given
> > correct encoding, like: -misc-fixed-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-iso10646-1, but
> > I just checked and in fact
Alexander Polakov dixit (2008-02-10, 02:41):
> > Yeah. Thanks, it helped me with some Czech characters in UTF-8. Only one
> > (rather cosmetic) flaw is that with your patch dmenu is little bit
> > higher.
> >
> Thanks for the feedback. I noticed the height issue myself, but don't
> know how to fi
pancake dixit (2008-01-11, 15:36):
> maybe someone who is showing a window to another ppl on a external
> monitor or projector not visible by the one who is working on the "local"
> monitor.
This has been discussed on the list previously. X does not allow to
display a window on both heads. Other
Peter Vollmar dixit (2008-01-09, 23:05):
> The problem is that fetchmail accesses the mail server as often as the
> other services in the status bar are accessed - usually every few
> seconds, which is unnecessarily often for imap! I've changed it to 60
> seconds, which is about the lowest reasona
Asbjørn Clemmensen dixit (2007-12-20, 12:39):
> This would definitely be a very nice feature to have in dwm. That way I could
> turn sound back off in Pidgin and not miss out on people's messages.
It might be easier to just add something to your status line (as I do
for tkabber). I do it by analy
Pieter Verberne dixit (2007-12-14, 11:13):
> I don't like the dependencies either. For me it is pretty important
> that software is not any bigger (contain more code) than necessary.
> (webbrowsers are my biggest irritation.)
Yeah, webbrowsers are a major problem. I really love the vimperator
ext
Kai Grossjohann dixit (2007-12-14, 10:13):
> > So from 'stand' and 'sys' the lines are cut off! This really makes -much-
> > less usable. This occurs both with Xterm and rxvt. (Kai once gave me the
> > advice to use urxvt but OpenBSD does not have a port for it.)
> At home, I started to use gnome
Jeremy O'Brien dixit (2007-12-11, 12:37):
> Haha. You gave me this script before, and it was the one that I was
> previously using. Worked like a charm! Unfortunately, IMAP works
> differently and doesn't populate my ~/.maildir directory anymore :(
> Thank you though! :)
LOL, excuse my Alzheimer.
Engin Tola dixit (2007-12-11, 14:46):
> I just check the size of the mail file to see if it is non-zero. And
> then I print an 'M' to my status bar like this:
>
> mail_file=/var/mail/tola
> if [ -s $mail_file ]
> then
> mail=M
> else
> mail=''
> fi
I have a background fetchmail (via p
Chris Webb dixit (2007-12-11, 13:11):
> > This way you can achieve any of the possibilities (show the same client in
> > both
> > monitors, move a window from one to another, etc..
>
> X doesn't give you a mechanism for showing the same client on both monitors.
Ah, that solves my dilemma. I tho
pancake dixit (2007-12-11, 14:08):
> Why not just keep it simple and store a seltags[] for each monitor and
> a single variable indicating which is the current monitor selected?
>
> This way you can achieve any of the possibilities (show the same
> client in both monitors, move a window from one t
Steven Blatchford dixit (2007-12-10, 19:31):
> Why can't you do something like:
> ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'command'
>
> eg ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'ls -l'
Because the whole key exchange for this single command would generate 50
times more traffic than an interactive session and would have an even
wo
Seth Graham dixit (2007-12-10, 10:17):
> > It's sad to say, but I think terminal will never be 100% flicker-free
>> when resizing. There is no such thing as loosing line endings because
>> you used Mod-0 instead of Mod-9. In the fact, I'd much prefer them to
>> stay at 80char (or a multiple). It
pancake dixit (2007-12-10, 16:50):
> > climit / clientspertag also has this problem. In case of climit, a climit of
> > 1 starts the monocle mode so things are better. However, for 1 < climit <
> > number of visible tiled clients, changing the focus can go to a client not
> > being shown (which is
Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2007-12-10, 15:24):
> > > I like the monocle suggestion... switching to the next client
> > > returns the currently maximized client to its previous state (tiled or
> > > floating+prev dimensions) and maximizes the next client.
> >
> > Me too. This issue has also been almos
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
