hi Szabolcs,
* Szabolcs Nagy [2009-04-29 13:37:17 +0200]:
> On 4/28/09, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
> > I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
> >
>
> cad softwares (and many related formats are closed as well)
Was already on my list.
> fpga t
Hi yiyus,
* yy [2009-04-28 00:03:27 +0200]:
> But it is not always possible. I can give you a (quite long) list of
> software that doesn't have a free equivalent.
I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
Thanks,
Matthias
* David E. Thiel [2009-04-25 13:27:51 -0701]:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Dusan wrote:
> > Please keep bar, that's why dwm is great out of the box.
>
> Agreed. A window manager should be usable on its own, and have sensible
> defaults. Ability to customize is great, but it should
Hi Veselin,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-04 11:04:32 +]:
> For a cleaner approach,
[...]
Thank you very much! That is really cool :)
Best wishes,
Matthias
Hello Archie,
* Archie Elberling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-24 23:02:09 +0100]:
> >Second this change would make the
> > license incompatible with the GPL (which should be obviated even if you
> > do not agree with the GPL).
>
> If you do not agree with something, then what is the point in maki
* Evan Gates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-23 18:11:39 -0700]:
> Any and all improvements and significant changes to the Software shall be
> made public and the above copyright holders shall be notified.
Just a short note: Please do not!!! See David Wheeler's article
http://www.dwheeler.com/essays
* hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 19:13:11 -0400]:
> > yes
> > lack of knowledge can mean lack of freedom (with my definition)
>
> So you have you own definition?
[...]
That's our freedom (in your definition). Szabolcs and I can use terms in
another way than you, you hiro can curse on pu
* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 18:23:43 +0200]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
> > that this is DWM and b) knows that DW
* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 18:07:53 +0200]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
> > that this is DWM and b) knows that DW
Hello Kurt,
* Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 09:58:00 -0500]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How should someone know what a tiling window manager is, when he does
> > not know what a window manger
* Kurt H Maier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 09:08:12 -0500]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a)
> > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is
* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 14:20:31 +0200]:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Sylvain Bertrand
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The discussion wasn't about whether or not GPL provides freedom
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-19 22:38:15 +0200]:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are people (like) you who say modified BSD/MIT licenses are more
> > free, because users/developers have the freedom to make the software
&g
Hi Sander,
just my personal point of view:
* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-19 19:48:51 +0200]:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Sylvain Bertrand
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Freedom which does not defend itself *will* be abused again and again,
>
> Define abuse? According t
Hello Anshelm,
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-19 16:33:36 +0200]:
> My licensing reasons are rather pragmatic, the reasons why I
> don't use the GPL* are:
>
> 1) I don't understand it completely and in any detail. So I
> stick to MIT that I know and understand any impact of it.
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 16:05:16 +0200]:
> Do people prefer having a fine-grain bar positioning setup or is
> it more preferred to have a bar setup in the sense "top or
> bottom"? I still believe the latter idea is nicer, if someone
> wants to use dzen, patch updategeom o
Hello Anselm,
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-03 23:10:08 +0200]:
> dmenu-3.6 is a bugfix release and dwm-4.9 contains some new
> improvements:
>
> - fine grain DEFGEOM geometry definition in config.h
> - revival of setmfact and MFACT in config.h (same applies to Mod1-h and
>
Hello Anselm,
I like what you outlined. But I have some questions.
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-02 16:11:54 +0200]:
> Initially there is 1 column, a new client is inserted below the
> currently selected window in the column, similiar to the stack
> in tiled layout.
If I open a
18 matches
Mail list logo
