* Sander van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-20 18:23:43 +0200]: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Matthias Kirschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why do you think a user who gets DWM in a binary on some device knows a) > > that this is DWM and b) knows that DWM is licensed under MIT? So this > > user does not have the freedom to use, study, share and improve the > > software. > > So now software is only free when each and every distributor is forced > to educate his customers about all the wonderful things they are > allowed to do with it?
For the record: I did not say that. Software is free, when the user has the freedom to use, study, share and improve it. > This is just another display of your misunderstanding of the concept > "freedom". Really, buy a dictionary... Thanks for the advise :)
