On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:16:13AM +0300, Daniel Bainton wrote:
> On 10/2/07, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone has tryed "xcompmgr -Ffc" under dwm? :)))
> >
> > Quite eyecandy, but not much useful/fast...but nice to see.
> >
> > http://news.nopcode.org/without.png
> > vs
> >
On 10/2/07, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone has tryed "xcompmgr -Ffc" under dwm? :)))
>
> Quite eyecandy, but not much useful/fast...but nice to see.
>
> http://news.nopcode.org/without.png
> vs
> http://news.nopcode.org/with.png
>
> The yeahlaunch shadow is quite nice to see
xcompmgr -a is nice to avoid unnecesary window redraws.
Otherwise i don't see the use.
Maarten.
On 10/2/07, pancake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone has tryed "xcompmgr -Ffc" under dwm? :)))
>
> Quite eyecandy, but not much useful/fast...but nice to see.
>
> http://news.nopcode.org/wit
Does anyone has tryed "xcompmgr -Ffc" under dwm? :)))
Quite eyecandy, but not much useful/fast...but nice to see.
http://news.nopcode.org/without.png
vs
http://news.nopcode.org/with.png
The yeahlaunch shadow is quite nice to see too, but you have
to try it by yourself. I'm not planning to ma
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 11:20 +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?
Um, you haven't released dwm-4.5 yet!
Cheers! -RPM
On 9/21/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being.
>
> What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?
Probably not much, but I don't have time to maintain a patch.
It's ok th
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi e
On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to pres
2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbo
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
> >
> > awesome is, yet, another window manag
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
> >
> > awesome is, yet, another window manag
On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
> >
> > awesome is, yet, another window manag
On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
>
> awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm source code.
> In contrast to dwm, it d
At 1190296032 time_t, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> "there's no stupid limit on its source size, we have features we want."
>
> That seems rather combative! Are you calling Anselm stupid?
Not at all. I think the idea is quite stupid, YMMV.
Smart people can have weird idea, I'm sure you're aware
about t
On 9/20/07, Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "there's no stupid limit on its source size, we have features we want."
>
> That seems rather combative! Are you calling Anselm stupid?
I wouldn't have used the word "stupid", but I personally think
excessively concentrating on SLOC tends to
Hi,
* Jeremy O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-20 15:51]:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
[...]
> "there's no stupid limit on its source size, we have features we want."
>
> That seems rather combative! Are you calling Anselm stupid?
"This keeps its userbase s
I would say that the lines of code limit is very smart! It make you think
before you change/add something, that is much better the wondering how
things got so out of hand further down the road. Any idiot can make software
do anything with unlimited space/resources. That is the reason we have so
muc
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
>
> awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm source code.
> In contrast
Hi everybody,
With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm source code.
In contrast to dwm, it does not have any limit about its SLOC size.
Consequently, it alre
19 matches
Mail list logo
