Re: [DX-CHAT] 2° MDXC HF Convention - timing

2006-03-29 Thread Zack Widup
Yes, and same date as a local hamfest here (Peoria Superfest), the W9DXCC convention and the second weekend of the 10 GHz contest. What's a guy to do? :-) 73, Zack W9SZ On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Ragnar Otterstad wrote: > Bad timing - same weekend as the Clipperton DX Club meeting in Arcachon ! >

RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info TROLLing

2006-03-29 Thread n7ef
  Dude!  DUDE!!  You are impugning a great group of radio amateurs:   http://www.ab0zo.org/   Welcome to the b0ZO Amateur Radio Fraternity!   Apologies are in order     -- Original message from Peter Penta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- You are right…the few B0Z

RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info TROLLing

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Penta
Title: Message You are right…the few B0Z0’s ruin it for all. Just like the morons who decided to take 18 MHz, 17meter cards and decided they wanted to be top banders and toss in a period.  1.8 MHz WOW !!! I am on 160 and getting cards Sad but true.  Now top banders either have to drive

Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread N7MAL
Title: Message I have never heard of the Trolling thing until today. How serious/rampant is this Trolling? Is there any serious documentation available? How does it effect yours or my certificates? Can you or I no longer point to our certificates with pride?   The bottom line to those questi

Re: Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread wn3vaw
Some do, some don't. Some who don't have their reasons. You may not always agree with them, but they have them. Sometimes it's a simple as not realizing that there is a major mail intercept problem, because even when they get only 1 in 10, they still get innundated with QSL requests. Hopeful

Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread Peter Penta
Well, for starters ... your right ... BUT online logs state band and mode only, no time or date. A contact means getting the call right, and an exchange of a correct signal report at the least. TROLLING for BUSTED CALLS, if you didn't get the call right, well maybe you should just delete it

RE: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV
Title: Message > Why can't the ARRL make LOTW information available via a 'read-only' > search engine.   Quite simply, the ARRL does not want anyone "trolling" for QSOs.  Either the information uploaded by both stations matches or it does not.  To allow unrestricted searching would invi

Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread N7MAL
I have received several emails reminding me LOTW is, at best, only available for ARRL DXCC & WAS. WHY??? Why can't the ARRL make LOTW information available via a 'read-only' search engine. Logbook search engines are a 'dime-a-dozen', the technology is readily available and does not have to b

[DX-CHAT] ZS0S via PS7JN

2006-03-29 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C
Someone may want to organize a registered group mailing to Joca. Try asking the [EMAIL PROTECTED] reflector, I think there was a similar discussion there a week ago. 73 - Jim AD1C p.s. I have 100% success getting cards from him. Maybe I'm just lucky. -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, Nor

Re: [DX-CHAT] QSL info

2006-03-29 Thread ON7YX
Qsl address on the ZW0S qsl : PS7JN Joaquim das Virgens Neto Rua Carlos Serrano,1969 59076-740 Natal-RN-Brazil 73's Ron ON7YX - Original Message - From: "Mark Horowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:58 PM Subject: [DX-CHAT] QSL info Does anyone have a good