On 12/29/2007 1:18 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GOOD logging software like the freeware LOGGER32 allow you to control
this locally so that all spots come in from your node source, but are
filtered according to your filter selections before being placed on the
DX SPOTS page which is what you mo
I think all clusters allow you to "set" the filters you want in place. Not all
clusters use the same software so the command syntax will be different between
nodes. The node should be able to help you do this.
GOOD logging software like the freeware LOGGER32 allow you to control this
locally s
My log shows it to have been P51BH.
John Owens - N7TK
-- Original message --
From: "Ronald Loneker Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wasn't that the call used in P5/OH2AM ??
>
> GERRY wrote:
> >
> > It's clear that OH2AM is a club call and therefore Class C.
> >
> > call
Ron Notarius W3WN a écrit :
Then there's the matter of the use of the OH2AM call itself. Now, on
this matter, I'm on shakier ground since I'm not extremely familiar
with the CEPT regulations. But the implications in the letter of
"criminal offenses" bother me on several levels. Here in the
Shelby:
This topic gets regurgetated periodically and the answer will be the same as
before. Froom Hans (DK9KXA or DK9XX?) who was part of the group that went there:
No documentation was sent to DXCC because they never got actual paper
confirmation of permission to operate there. They had verba
Remember VK0LD/VK0MM?
When he first went on the air in 1999, at least one third party sent a
"routine" query to the DXCC desk regarding the legitimacy of the operation
from Macquarie. The third party received back a standard "we have to see
documentation" reply. This was then relayed to Alan, co
"7O1YGF remains in "pending documentation" status."
As is, at least for me, ZB2/4O3AL. I fail to understand, if an operation is
legitimate, why the operator(s) are reluctant to send documentation?
HNY to all
C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.
If that's true, there should be no complaint about the other operation.
John K5MO
At 11:24 AM 12/29/2007, Win wrote:
WHERE ARE ALL THE FJ HAMS RIGHT NOW?
I think we can assume that the FJs that live on the island are not DXers,
and probably could not handel the resulting pile-ups.
Win, W
Hi Jim,
You have several options.
http://www.dxcluster.info lists all known DX cluster nodes. Check the
Notes coluumn on the "Telnet Directory" page to see if there are US-only
nodes. As someone already suggested, AB5K-2 appears to be one such node.
Using the CC User program from VE7CC, yo
I think it's really up to the licensing authority for FJ (the French I believe)
to decide if the use of the CEPT licence is valid in this case.
Gerry VE6LB
- Original Message -
From: Ron Notarius W3WN
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 8:14 AM
Subject:
WHERE ARE ALL THE FJ HAMS RIGHT NOW?
I think we can assume that the FJs that live on the island are not DXers,
and probably could not handel the resulting pile-ups.
Win, W0LZ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items o
I was wondering when that was going to come up.
7O1YGF was NOT disallowed by the DXCC because the license was signed by the
wrong person.
In fact... it has not been disallowed at all, as I understand it.
7O1YGF remains in "pending documentation" status.
That is to say that, as would be the case
W2AY..I did consider the facts..and that's why I ask again ..why all the
fuzz? They are trying to elbow the FJ operation out of the way (very well
documented I may add) and now they aren't even on the air? That is not
logical to me, like somebody else said "where are all the locals" and
another
I agree 100%. Where are the locals? If they decided to make Tennessee a new
DXCC entity, I would be on the air as much as Martti was (what an amazing
effort). If I could not be FIRST, then I would be first to get the QSL cards
in the hands of the deserving. I'd have a local printer working hard
Well, 7O1YGF was disallowed for DXCC because the license (or whatever) was
supposedly signed by the "wrong person". I'm not trying to start
something, but I figure if that technicality is enough to disallow credit,
this probably is too.
But several have mentioned something I'd not thought abo
Ironic the way favorites can be forgiven by those who write often on this
reflector while condemning others for similar or lesser offences. Some pigs
are more equal than others on this reflector and at DXCC.. oh, how human we
are! 73Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feed
16 matches
Mail list logo
