At 06:17 PM 12/31/02 +, W0YG Charlie Summers wrote:
...
Here is the current policy just received from Bill Moore at the DXCC Desk:
Recent discussion regarding the QSL service offered by eQSL.ccTM suggests
that there is
Lou,
I don't have any experience with the interface you are considering, but I
did have (apparently) the same problem with my CT-17 and faced the same
quandry. My choice was to assume that the MAX232 chip in the CT-17 was
fried (the IC is about the most fragile component in there) and decided to
Mel,
The point of my post was to let Lou, and anyone else facing the same problem
with their CT-17s, know just how easy and inexpensive they are to fix. I
wasn't attacking ICOM for overpricing their products, or complaining about
the cost of technology. Everyone recognizes the value of
If you added up the cost of the components of a Pro II, I doubt that
would come out anywhere near the selling price either... But then, is
the value of the Mona Lisa calculated in terms of a little canvas and
some oil paint?
Happy New year to all...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
4 matches
Mail list logo