[Dx4win] ARRL eQSL policy

2002-12-31 Thread Pete Smith
At 06:17 PM 12/31/02 +, W0YG Charlie Summers wrote: ... Here is the current policy just received from Bill Moore at the DXCC Desk: Recent discussion regarding the QSL service offered by eQSL.ccTM suggests that there is

[Dx4win] ICOM 765 !

2002-12-31 Thread Gregory Brown
Lou, I don't have any experience with the interface you are considering, but I did have (apparently) the same problem with my CT-17 and faced the same quandry. My choice was to assume that the MAX232 chip in the CT-17 was fried (the IC is about the most fragile component in there) and decided to

[Dx4win] ICOM 765 !

2002-12-31 Thread Gregory Brown
Mel, The point of my post was to let Lou, and anyone else facing the same problem with their CT-17s, know just how easy and inexpensive they are to fix. I wasn't attacking ICOM for overpricing their products, or complaining about the cost of technology. Everyone recognizes the value of

[Dx4win] ICOM 765 !

2002-12-31 Thread Mel Martin (VE2DC)
If you added up the cost of the components of a Pro II, I doubt that would come out anywhere near the selling price either... But then, is the value of the Mona Lisa calculated in terms of a little canvas and some oil paint? Happy New year to all... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL