Yup, there's some nice graphics and the look-n-feel seems a little more
modern (which you expect from a 'Mac' look-n-feel). The map is certainly
sexier.
But, the QSO window looks completely cluttered and less intuitive than
DX4WIN. Given the amount of miscellaneous graphics, such as photos, QSL
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is almost enough to make me buy a Mac
>
> Steve/Paul: Why can't the Intel-based community do this
>
> http://dogparksoftware.com/MacLoggerDX.html
And in the near future, you might almost afford to be able to buy one!
http://www.theinquirer.net
I'll have to agree - almost enough to make me run out and get a Mac
tooI've drooled over their software for quite awhile. My son is a
Mac-user and keeps tempting me. And no worries about viruses and all that
stuff that W. Gates has inspired. ;-)
Cheers and 73,
Joe
WD?M
At 02:42 PM 12/30
This is almost enough to make me buy a Mac
Steve/Paul: Why can't the Intel-based community do this
_http://dogparksoftware.com/MacLoggerDX.html_
(http://dogparksoftware.com/MacLoggerDX.html)
Check out the "more screen shots"
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 30 16:58:03 2004
From:
I agree with this idea. I use my laptop with DX4WIN at many locations. At
home I use a USB interface for CAT, PTT, and CW keying. If I start DX4WIN
in the field without the USB devices, I get a bunch of errors that the ports
could not be opened. DX4WIN could either use a default "location" on
Hi Paul,
Just returned from ZK1GNZ and FO/F6GNZ DX-pedition, which has led me make
you a wish for one of the next releases of DX4WIN:
My suggestion is to separate the licensing procedure from "Preferences" .
Different "Preferences" should be edited and used when creating new logs
during field-
6 matches
Mail list logo