Hey guys,
Why would you use LOTW if all you need is a printout of calls and no
cards unless CQ wants to see a card? I would think there is some more
ironing out to do here for anyone to use LOTW for this.I don't think you
even need eQSL for WPX.
I only have 64 mixed on LOTW so far when DX4W rep
bject: [Dx4win] WPX LOTW versus DX4WIN
I must be missing something.
I have uploaded over 73,000 QSO to LOTW and have 26,451 QSL records.
However, I only have 184 mix WPX. For that many QSL records, I would have
expected a ton of unique call signs.
DX4WIN shows 750 WPX confirmed.
Maybe I ne
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Jim - N4ST wrote:
> Yeah, I'm only averaging 1 or 2 per day being added to my WPX Mixed total.
> I did go in and manually add some just to see it work, but at 12 cents each,
> I will get my WPX 1000 endorsement sticker via eQSL instead of paying $120
> to LoTW.
Th
y, July 16, 2012 01:57
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] WPX LOTW versus DX4WIN
> My experience is similar. With over 100K QSOs, DX4WIN reports that I
> should have over 2000 WPX confirmed on LoTW alone. The LoTW web site
shows 238.
A week after I wrote this, and my total is
> My experience is similar. With over 100K QSOs, DX4WIN reports that I should
> have over 2000 WPX confirmed on LoTW alone. The LoTW web site shows 238.
A week after I wrote this, and my total is up to a whopping 252 mixed
prefixes. Wow. Something's going really slowly...
73 - Jim AD1C
--
J
Garceau
Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] WPX LOTW versus DX4WIN
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Robert Garceau wrote:
> I have uploaded over 73,000 QSO to LOTW and have 26,451 QSL records.
>
> However, I only have 184 mix WPX. For that many QSL records, I would
> have expec
On the other hand my log shows (by LotW only) Mixed: 1092, SSB: 469.
CW: 664, and Digital: 587. While LotW has Mixed: 1093, SSB: 469.
CW: 664. and Digital: 588 and has been that way for several days.
One item for some - you may need to link/merge accounts if you have
ever had multiple calls. Th
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Robert Garceau wrote:
> I have uploaded over 73,000 QSO to LOTW and have 26,451 QSL records.
>
> However, I only have 184 mix WPX. For that many QSL records, I would have
> expected a ton of unique call signs.
My experience is similar. With over 100K QSOs, DX4WIN
Dr Bob,
I find same!
73, Milos, OK1MP
-
-Original Message-
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 08:15:17 -0400
From: "Robert Garceau"
Subject: [Dx4win] WPX LOTW versus DX4WIN
To:
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Robert Garceau wrote:
> I must be missing something.
>
> I have uploaded over 73,000 QSO to LOTW and have 26,451 QSL records.
>
> However, I only have 184 mix WPX. For that many QSL records, I would have
> expected a ton of unique call signs.
>
The Logbook of the
WPX credits.
Jim - N4ST
-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Robert Garceau
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2012 08:15
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] WPX LOTW versus DX4WIN
I must be missing something.
I have
I must be missing something.
I have uploaded over 73,000 QSO to LOTW and have 26,451 QSL records.
However, I only have 184 mix WPX. For that many QSL records, I would have
expected a ton of unique call signs.
DX4WIN shows 750 WPX confirmed.
Maybe I need to download the WPX file from LO
12 matches
Mail list logo
