Hi David,
FWIW you can do exactly this:
Cheque type payments could be accepted (deposited), rejected or ignored by
the payee. Accepted payments would be cleared or bounce on deposit. Cheques
could be reserved against the payer's account balance, e.g. a 10 gram
secured cheque would reduce the paye
a smart accounts based payment system would allow the account owner to
control both incoming and outgoing payments. The logic is as follows:
payments can be made by the payer authorising the payment then either
sending it to the payee as a cheque, or through the accounts system as a
transfer.
payee
If you can't find any and want to make do with Listserv and Majordomo
access (subscription through trigger mail, austoresponders, etc.) then
c'mon over to www.cyberica.net :o)
Cheers,
Robert.
CYBERFRONTIER U2NETWORKS
privacy domain and website hosting
http
I agree, It appears Steve Renner has acted extremely badly... my
commiserations to Danny, I wish you the best in getting your pound of flesh.
Sidd.
: While it is disturbing that it was so easy, what leaps out at me most was
: that CashCards clearly made no good-faith gesture to attempt to recov
Dear Margestjohn, thank you! for posting the link. I managed to pick
six winners using the concept. I missed one - the Baltimore Orioles lost
to Boston. Please email me your e-gold no. and I will send you a small
thank you.
> Hi, you might find this interesting:-
> http://www.timecities.
While it is disturbing that it was so easy, what leaps out at me most was
that CashCards clearly made no good-faith gesture to attempt to recover
these funds, and the judge in question must surely realise that from the
paper proceedings.
And if that is the case ... Steve Renner, if you're readi
> From: Danny Van den Berghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
> I would like to report to you what has happened to me, because I think
> this is a
> precedent with dangerous implications for all of us.
>
[...]
>
> What is e-gold going to do about this?
> Clearly the system is not safe. Non
At 02:03 PM 4/4/03 +0200, "Danny Van den Berghe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apparently my account was frozen by court order
>On Friday, March 21, 2003, Cash Cards was attempting to fund an E-Gold
account
for one of its customers, in the amount of $3,260.00, but Cash Cards
inadvertently put the
> What is e-gold going to do about this?
> Clearly the system is not safe. Non-repudiable payment is now a joke, it
is
> simply rejected by the court.
> Somebody wants his money back, he can go to the Minesota court and say the
> payment was made by mistake:
> account is ordered frozen without any
Hi all,
I would like to report to you what has happened to me, because I think this is a
precedent with dangerous implications for all of us.
Apparently my account was frozen by court order.
Yesterday I found my account unaccessible.
>From an email which was still in my trash bin I learned the f
Hi group,
does anybody know a full (binary) newsgroup service provider that does
accept e-gold ?
Thanks in advance,
Joern
--
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SR
11 matches
Mail list logo
