[e-gold-list] Has any had dealings?

2003-10-04 Thread Norman John
I was sent this to look at, this person takes e-gold. I have had 2 conflicting reports on this http://eomplus.com/ any personal involvement would be helpful...:) --- You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use e-g

[e-gold-list] Re: When e-gold takes off in a big way

2003-10-04 Thread Patrick Chkoreff
On Friday, October 3, 2003, at 06:10 PM, FileMatrix wrote: The supply of gold remains constant; the supply of goods increases. Value of gold relative to goods increases. So, you're the big chief of a country. I am the big chief of another. We have economies that we equally value to 1 ton of gol

[e-gold-list] Re: units

2003-10-04 Thread Patrick Chkoreff
On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 03:11 AM, Wilkinson Jens wrote: I actually had a scenario in mind when I asked this question. I was trying to imagine some small town grocer selling apples, and having to write up a sign that says: one apple - 0.008 GAU, which doesn't seem the easiest way to write

[e-gold-list] Those delightful astronomers

2003-10-04 Thread Jim Davidson
Dear Wilkinson, I really meant it as an order of magnitude rather than a specific value. Well, groovy. $99 is the same as $11 if we are only going to order of magnitude. I tell you what, you can buy all the grams of gold I've got for $99 each. I learned this important feature when studying astro

[e-gold-list] Re: When e-gold takes off in a big way

2003-10-04 Thread FileMatrix
Dear Steve, > Why do you think the second chef would assume the first trade was fair? I think that because Patrick said his economy has a fixed value in gold. I simple gave an example: 1 ton of gold. Besides, he also said that people own gold (so, the power / economy), not the state, so all I nee

[e-gold-list] Re: units

2003-10-04 Thread Wilkinson Jens
--- Jim Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Jim, Thanks for the response. > > I think that a gram is worth about 10 dollars, > > I think that's mistaken. It is closer to $12. I really meant it as an order of magnitude rather than a specific value. I mea