From: "The Gold Economy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:24:21 -0500
X-Message-Number: 1
>However, PGP is extremely vulnerable to keystroke logging.
>Clipboard pasting your PGP password simply shifts the
>vulnerability to clipboard logging. And the PGP private
>key would seem to b
>However, PGP is extremely vulnerable to keystroke logging.
>Clipboard pasting your PGP password simply shifts the
>vulnerability to clipboard logging. And the PGP private
>key would seem to be something one could grab off the
>user's hard drive over the 'net.
PGP may be vulnerable to keystroke l
PGP has announced a major breakthrough in email encryption! Read the
article:
http://goldeconomy.com/ct/t.php?l=144
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use e-gold's Secure Randomized Keyboard (SRK) when a
Dan wrote:
<< Did you know that the new version 8 of PGP freeware does not include
any mail encryption/decryption. To use that feature you need to buy a
personal licence for $50 USD which sucks !!! Those of us with Win XP
will have to keep making do unless we want to pay. >>
If you're a Wind
Did you know that the new version 8 of PGP freeware does not include any
mail encryption/decryption. To use that feature you need to buy a personal
licence for $50 USD which sucks !!! Those of us with Win XP will have to
keep making do unless we want to pay.
Oh well.
I love to
---
You are
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26998.html
has details. I could still use some help in getting
pgp.com to accept e-gold. So far, I have yet to get
any response from the new pgp.com whatsoever, even
though they are ideally suited for using e-gold. I
know a number of people who are waiting f
Hi, does anyone on the list have experience integrating PGP with
AOL's e-mail program (or excuse for an e-mail program, as some
would call it! ;)? If so, please reply off list. Thanks.
JMR
---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EM
Subject:
FC: Happy Birthday, PGP! Ten year anniversary of v1.0 release
today
Date:
Tue, 5 Jun 2001 23:06:07 -0400
From:
Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,44324,00.html
PGP: Happy
No, he cannot use the private key without the passphrase. On the other
hand, it really depends. If the passphrase is long and does not resemble
anything easy to guess ("X@#Ep8ONeHyZ7a" for example), whoever stole the
private key ring will probably never be able to crack its passphrase.
But if
No, he cannot use the private key without the passphrase. On the other
hand, it really depends. If the passphrase is long and does not resemble
anything easy to guess ("X@#Ep8ONeHyZ7a" for example), whoever stole the
private key ring will probably never be able to crack its passphrase.
But if
Here's a crypto question:
PGP private keys are stored in a keyring file on
the hard disk. If an intruder were able to steal the private key ring, can
he use the private key without the passphrase? Is it significantly easier
to brute-force the passphrase if one has the private key
ring?
_
Subject:
[PGP-USERS] A group of Czech cryptographers has claimed to have
broken OpenPGP...
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:19:26 -0500
From:
Robert Guerra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
"PGP-User's Mailing List" <[EMAIL
12 matches
Mail list logo
