Andrew McMeikan wrote:
>
> Perth Mint (perthmint.com) has unallocated storage with no agio, but a fee
> for re-issuing ownership certificates whenever the amount has to change.
>
> http://perthmint.com/depository/pmcp/product.shtml
>
> I really need to go and visit these guys and see how hard i
Perth Mint (perthmint.com) has unallocated storage with no agio, but a fee
for re-issuing ownership certificates whenever the amount has to change.
http://perthmint.com/depository/pmcp/product.shtml
I really need to go and visit these guys and see how hard it is set up.
I am however thinking of
>JP wrote:
>
>>
>
>What happens to the "agio" part when a system without a storage fee deploys?
>
Thinking about it, it would be impossible to not charge for storge. (How?)
I guess the storage fees could be incorporated in the spend
> Steve wrote
> What happens to the "agio" part when a system without a storage fee deploys?
>
I would be very wary of any GBC, or GBPS, system that doesn't charge a
storage fee, yet claims to be 100% backed. Secure storage of tons of gold
is nowhere near free. The money to pay these bills has t
JP wrote:
<>
What happens to the "agio" part when a system without a storage fee deploys?
Viking referred once or twice to GBC for gold based currency, which is
succinct, but perhaps GBPS for gold based payment system would be almost as
succinct but sufficiently inclusive.
-=Steve=-
===
