At 04:19 PM 7/03/2002 -0500, Patrick wrote:
>From: "Ian Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > At 09:43 AM 7/03/2002 -0500, Patrick wrote:
> > >I know the comparison of GoldMoney with PBS was happenstance, but did you
> > >HAVE to? :-)
> >
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > It's not that I don't think that GoldMon
> I know the comparison of GoldMoney with PBS was happenstance, but did
> you HAVE to? :-)
Hello Patrick,
I think that Ian's remark is perfectly understandable. Everybody will
preach for the gold currencies he prefers. I would also have been
somehwat shocked if e-gold had been my prefered GC.
On 7 Mar 2002, at 23:35, Ian Green wrote:
> Note the broken link to the undoubtedly industry pioneering and market
> leading competitor, and the offhanded and deceptive way of dismissing
> a company the article could not ignore, as if it were merely an
> upstart!
Hello Ian, I agree with you. The
From: "Ian Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.zealllc.com/2002/digigold.htm
>
> This is like writing an article on the development of the broadcasting
> industry and saying stop by www.pbs.org for an organization at the cutting
> edge of broadcasting technology, unmatched in quality and lead
At 07:06 AM 4/03/2002 +1100, "Michael Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Over lengthy but interesting article
>
>http://www.zealllc.com/2002/digigold.htm
And from the article:
> Stop by www.GoldMoney.com to see a real-life honest-to-goodness
> digital gold company operating right now, at the
