[e-gold-list] Re: content as a private good

2001-11-04 Thread James M. Ray
At 03:32 PM -0600 11/03/2001, Jim Davidson wrote: ... Suppose I have content that I seek to exclude from public scrutiny until I am paid for it? Encryption helps me in this area, big time, if I want to store it where nobody else can see it, even if they hack my system. Of course. What he is/was

[e-gold-list] Re: content as a private good

2001-11-04 Thread jpm
Same with the Miami Herald. I've gone to the Dave Barry section there -- now http://www.miami.com/herald/special/features/barry/ weekly for years before I'd ever heard about e-gold. I'm sure many others have, too, but the only way of paying Dave (unless looking at ads counts) is buying a paper

[e-gold-list] Re: content as a private good

2001-11-04 Thread James M. Ray
At 01:20 AM +1100 11/05/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Jim! Dave Barry, I imagine, makes *millions of dollars* being syndicated. Of course, I never said he didn't! Mr Barry's response to Information should be free! Mainstream media jerks are jerks! Micropyaments!! would probably be a

[e-gold-list] Re: content as a private good

2001-11-04 Thread Boyd Pate
On Sun, 4 Nov 2001 08:47:34 -0500, James M. Ray wrote: I don't like the subscription model as well as the tipjar model, Could you explain the what you mean by the tipjar model? B Pate ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card