>> >So your point is that all advertising outlets, magazines/radio/TV/web,
>> >exist solely for the purpose of pushing more advertising. This isn't
>> >neccesarily true for *all* magazines, etc..., but let's go with it.
>> >
>> >Magazines, etc... exist for the sole purpose of advertising.
>> >
>>
> >So your point is that all advertising outlets, magazines/radio/TV/web,
> >exist solely for the purpose of pushing more advertising. This isn't
> >neccesarily true for *all* magazines, etc..., but let's go with it.
> >
> >Magazines, etc... exist for the sole purpose of advertising.
> >
> >You, a
>> Someone (Viking?) was implying that the ADS in magazines SUPPLEMENT
>> magazines incomes -- ie, mazgines/newspapers get income from the
>> cover price.
>>
>> That is not correct (the cover price is all-but irrelevant),
>> magazines, like all media, are simply things that exist because of
>> adv
> Someone (Viking?) was implying that the ADS in magazines SUPPLEMENT
> magazines incomes -- ie, mazgines/newspapers get income from the
> cover price.
>
> That is not correct (the cover price is all-but irrelevant),
> magazines, like all media, are simply things that exist because of
> adver
