Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82567LM e1000e DHCP problem/question

2009-03-16 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Pelle Svensson wrote: > Your assumption about the Intel AMT seems right! > > Log Tracking DHCP Request when plugged net cable in: > > - Power on and load Fedora -> No DHCP Request from BIOS until Desktop up > - ifdown eth0 -> DHCP Request > - Restart Fedora -> DHCP Request d

[E1000-devel] Returned mail: see transcript for details

2009-03-16 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
Hi. This is the MAILNARA program at "mail.asiaeconomy.co.kr". I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1) See the copy of the mail header and refer

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82567LM e1000e DHCP problem/question

2009-03-16 Thread Pelle Svensson
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:38:49 -0700 > From: jesse.brandeb...@intel.com > To: pelle2...@hotmail.com > CC: net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: Intel 82567LM e1000e DHCP problem/question > > good idea to include e1000

Re: [E1000-devel] e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?

2009-03-16 Thread Ben Greear
Dan Williams wrote: >> Well, that's an annoyance. Would it be that hard to allow modular drivers >> to compile-in their FW as well? It would be a nice option for >> those of us trying to build portable pre-compiled kernels for various >> distributions and distribution versions. > > Most of thos

Re: [E1000-devel] e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?

2009-03-16 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:05 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > >> The config & dmesg is attached. Some of the options are for patches we've > >> added, and we even have a small patch in the e100 (but have had it there > >> for years, so probably un-related to this). Still, I wil

Re: [E1000-devel] e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?

2009-03-16 Thread Ben Greear
Ben Hutchings wrote: >> The config & dmesg is attached. Some of the options are for patches we've >> added, and we even have a small patch in the e100 (but have had it there >> for years, so probably un-related to this). Still, I will not complain >> if you decide to ignore the report. > [...] >

Re: [E1000-devel] e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?

2009-03-16 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:13 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Ben Greear wrote: > >> I have selected build-firmware-into-kernel > >> but it seems e100 is still unhappy in 2.6.29-rc7. > >> > >> e100 :02:01.0: firmware: requesting e100/d102e_ucode.bin >

Re: [E1000-devel] e100 firmware in 2.6.29-rc7?

2009-03-16 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Ben Greear wrote: > I have selected build-firmware-into-kernel > but it seems e100 is still unhappy in 2.6.29-rc7. > > e100 :02:01.0: firmware: requesting e100/d102e_ucode.bin > e100: eth4: e100_request_firmware: Failed to load firmware > "e100/d102e_ucode.bin": -2 can y

Re: [E1000-devel] Intel 82567LM e1000e DHCP problem/question

2009-03-16 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
good idea to include e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net on these kinds of requests. On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Pelle Svensson wrote: > Is there any functionality inside the driver for DHCP request. > I see in the source that there is some kind of DHCP filter f the tx stream. > Can the drive issue DHCP