Re: [E1000-devel] [e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] x540 / 82599 IPsec offload - Linux ixgbe driver

2018-01-03 Thread Avi Cohen (A)
Hi Nelson 1. Can you tell what is the status of ixgbe – ipsec offload patch’s? 2. Are there any ‘numbers’ of performance tests? Ipsec in SW v.s. ipsec in HW ? 3. Where is the code for ipsec headers insertion/removal by SW ? is this done in ip-stack ? hooks ? Thanks You (a

Re: [E1000-devel] [e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] x540 / 82599 IPsec offload - Linux ixgbe driver

2018-01-03 Thread Alexander Duyck
Hi Avi, You might review the slides and watch the presentations available at: https://www.netdevconf.org/2.2/session.html?klassert-ipsec-workshop As far as the code you can review it directly in Jeff's tree at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/next-queue.git/log/?h=dev-que

Re: [E1000-devel] [e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] x540 / 82599 IPsec offload - Linux ixgbe driver

2018-01-03 Thread Shannon Nelson
Hi folks, it's nice to hear from you all. To your questions, Avi: 1. The Linux kernel stack didn't support ipsec when the ixgbe driver first came out. This support was only recently (in the last year) added. My patches are being tested by Intel before they push them up to net-next, but you a

Re: [E1000-devel] [e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] x540 / 82599 IPsec offload - Linux ixgbe driver

2018-01-03 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 09:21 -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote: > As Don mentioned below, I've forwarded the patches to Intel's git > tree > and they are currently under review and test with the Intel folks. > I > don't know their current progress, but I hope to see the patches > pushed > into net-nex