Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] igbvf: avoid name clash between PF and VF

2010-06-30 Thread Casey Leedom
| From: Stefan Assmann | Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 01:53 am | | This is not a udev bug since udev doesn't create persistent rules for | VFs as their MAC address changes every reboot. | | To avoid this problem we could change the kernel name for the VFs and | thus avoid confusion between VFs

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] igbvf: avoid name clash between PF and VF

2010-07-01 Thread Casey Leedom
| From: Stefan Assmann | Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 11:37 pm | | You're correct, the problem shouldn't occur with cxgb4vf and therefore | this change shouldn't be necessary. However we might consider a | consistent naming scheme for VFs in all drivers. But I don't have a | strong opinion abou