esday, March 8, 2017 2:09 PM
To: easybuild@lists.ugent.be
Subject: Re: [easybuild] GCCcore build in HMNS
Shahzeb,
Looks good to me. It is expected that GCCcore depends on dummy toolchain built
software since that is the only toolchain below GCCcore. In other words, you
need whatever has be
dency some apps did not work
correctly especially when they used –with-=$EBROOT
From: easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be
[mailto:easybuild-requ...@lists.ugent.be] On Behalf Of Vanzo, Davide
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:09 PM
To: easybuild@lists.ugent.be
Subject: Re: [easybuild] GCCcore build
On 03/08/2017 01:08 PM, Vanzo, Davide wrote:
Once you have GCCcore built, at this point you will use it to compile
again M4/Bison/flex/zlib/binutils within the GCCcore toolchain so that
whatever is built with GCC is completely independent from the
underlying OS software stack.
Which is still
Shahzeb,
Looks good to me. It is expected that GCCcore depends on dummy toolchain built
software since that is the only toolchain below GCCcore. In other words, you
need whatever has been built with the system compiler and binutils in order to
compile GCCcore. Once you have GCCcore built, at thi
Hello,
I want to find out if the build for GCCcore 5.4.0 is suppose to look like this
under HMNS. I have copied all the files from easybuild repo into my local
directory because I have disabled robot paths. One thing I don't understand
why there is M4 and binutils built with GCCcore toolchain
5 matches
Mail list logo
