Re: [Ecls-list] BUG: incorrect interpretation of compound type specifiers in compiler

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote: The following illustrates a bug in the handling of compound type specifiers in the compiler. The byte-compiler handles them correctly. The problem is not really in the compiler, but in the type checks it emits, which

Re: [Ecls-list] BUG: incorrect interpretation of compound type specifiers in compiler

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote: The problem is not really in the compiler, but in the type checks it emits, which rely on TYPEP Fixed in git/CVS Juanjo -- Instituto de FĂ­sica Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid

Re: [Ecls-list] BUG: SEGMENTATION-VIOLATION in code with DEFTYPE unicode char

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote: The following transcript illustrates a bug (on Linux/AMD64) when compiling code with low safety and type declarations involving unicode characters. A few things would be helpful - Configuration flags for ECL - Value

[Ecls-list] git commit id (fixed)

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
Until recently, ECL computed a unique identifier corresponding to the git repository using .git/ORIG_HEAD. It turns out that this is wrong. Now ECL uses .git/log/HEAD which contains a history of commits. I hope this will provide a more accurate information when producing bug reports. Juanjo --

Re: [Ecls-list] BUG: SEGMENTATION-VIOLATION in code with DEFTYPE unicode char

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote: The bytecode disassembly of my function is below. However, the function works fine when byte-compiled, only segfaulting when using the C compiler. I haven't managed to obtain disassembly when compiled via C. Sorry,

Re: [Ecls-list] ecl-test

2011-11-13 Thread Paul Bowyer
On 11/13/2011 01:02 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Paul Bowyer pbow...@olynet.com mailto:pbow...@olynet.com wrote: After deleting output/ecl/bugs.log, and running make in the ecl-test directory, I get a completed bugs.log but I also get slightly

Re: [Ecls-list] ecl-test

2011-11-13 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Paul Bowyer pbow...@olynet.com wrote: I downloaded yet again ecl-test (after saving copies of ansi.log and bugs.log) and re-ran the test suite. This time everything seemed to run without problems and I had complete files for ansi.log and bugs.log. I switched