On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Daniel Herring wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
If the test passes without -lintl, then that library is not used. If it
only passes with -lintl, then you don't care what OS you're on unti
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Daniel Herring wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> If the test passes without -lintl, then that library is not used. If it
> only passes with -lintl, then you don't care what OS you're on until
> somebody else finds a case where this br
On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> Autoconf is giving you a fake sense of security. Outside of standard
> features, the list of tests to be made is proportional to the number of
> differences of those platforms. And even then one cannot add those tests
> without checking
> the
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/18/10 11:36 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
>
> What should I check for? What should I need on each version of Solaris
>> that
>> exists out there? There is no way to treat that platform in a portable way
>> if that is waht you m
On 09/18/10 11:36 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> What should I check for? What should I need on each version of Solaris that
> exists out there? There is no way to treat that platform in a portable way
> if that is waht you mean. It is not portable at all what the solaris people
> opted for
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I'm sure you wont consider this a high priority, but ECL appears to be linking
> unnecessarily to libintl.so at least on OpenSolaris.
>
> An intersting blog post here
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/rie/entry/tt_dependencies_tt_define_what
>
> sh
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/18/10 10:45 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'm sure you wont consider this a high priority, but ECL appears to be
>>> linking
>>> unnecessarily to libintl.
On 09/18/10 10:45 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>> I'm sure you wont consider this a high priority, but ECL appears to be
>> linking
>> unnecessarily to libintl.so at least on OpenSolaris.
>>
>
> This is very very old. It comes fr
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I'm sure you wont consider this a high priority, but ECL appears to be
> linking
> unnecessarily to libintl.so at least on OpenSolaris.
>
This is very very old. It comes from the time when ECL was first ported to
Solaris and at that time
I'm sure you wont consider this a high priority, but ECL appears to be linking
unnecessarily to libintl.so at least on OpenSolaris.
An intersting blog post here
http://blogs.sun.com/rie/entry/tt_dependencies_tt_define_what
shows how to find out any unused libraries. The current version of ECL i
10 matches
Mail list logo
