RE:

1999-11-24 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Enjoy your dinner! > -- > From: Katrina M. Lewis[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 12:49 PM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT > > Happy Thanksgiving! > Katrina > > >

RE: Society for Human Population Control

1999-12-03 Thread Wong Ee Ling
For some reason Russell makes perfect sense. What a disillusionment. Regards, Eeling @ Zin Singapore > -- > From: vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 8:58 PM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT

RE: Society for Human Population Control

1999-12-06 Thread Wong Ee Ling
within the confins of a power > structure that seems to be actively destroying most of the planet. > Overpopulation has to be addressed as the primary focus. Until that is > curbed > most other work is futile.. > > Wong Ee Ling wrote: > > > For some reason Russel

RE: BUTTERFLY NOT FREE YET

1999-12-07 Thread Wong Ee Ling
I don't understand. Could someone enlightened me how 'sitting' up some big redwood tree at 'Humboldt county' serve woman's rights ? Hahahahah > -- > From: vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 7:50 PM

RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of discussion

1999-12-07 Thread Wong Ee Ling
IRONMENT > Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control > > I don't understand why you think it's a disillusionment. > The more people realise what is necessary the better. > On Fri, 3 Dec 1999 21:24:11 +1100 Russell Edwards > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

RE: Society for Human Population Control

1999-12-07 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Vicki...are you the "president' of ECOFEM? > -- > From: vikki charles[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 8:08 PM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT > Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control > >

RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of discussion

1999-12-07 Thread Wong Ee Ling
-Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong Ee Ling > > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:57 PM > > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT > > Subject: RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of > >

RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of discussion

1999-12-07 Thread Wong Ee Ling
> I'm unsubscribing. > Best wishes, > Viviane > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong Ee Ling > > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:57 PM > > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVI

FW: One WTO account

1999-12-08 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Dear Unleesh, I am not oppose to what you expressed but can I clarify that the political philosopy that was called 'Anarchism' did not initially advocate any form of violence nor destruction? I like to know if the action by the 'disempowered' people as demonstrated, is the 21st century definition

RE: REPLY: One WTO account

1999-12-08 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Dear Black Bloc, In the event that after personal investigation, one finds your group with 'strings' tied to a 'father figure' (that being said is against those wanting freedom) what do you say then that the very same tactics that you employ were to be used against your group for the very same r

RE: REPLY: One WTO account

1999-12-08 Thread Wong Ee Ling
The 'father figure' is symbolic of the 'oppresive' figure you're claiming freedom fromanyway, society is still within the boundaries of tightly controlled nation states, each with their own security to uphold so where is the gain IF (emphasized, that is, I am not saying it is conclusive..) one

RE: Society for Human Population Control

1999-12-09 Thread Wong Ee Ling
RE: Society for Human Population Control > > What makes you think thay? I'm not. Are you being nasty? > On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 09:04:26 +0800 Wong Ee Ling > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Vicki...are you the "president' of ECOFEM? > > > > > -

RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of discuss ion

1999-12-09 Thread Wong Ee Ling
RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of > discuss ion > > > On Wed, 8 Dec 1999 10:48:17 +0800 Wong Ee Ling > > > >Hello, I agree with what you are saying. It is a > disillusionment to realise that lobbying the governemtn is > a total waste

RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of discussion

1999-12-09 Thread Wong Ee Ling
NVIRONMENT > Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of > discussion > > Wong Ee Ling, > > That's one hell of a question... I missed much in conversation on the > list, > but that was one hell of a question. Who is the president of ecofem? &g

RE:

1999-12-12 Thread Wong Ee Ling
I understand you although not perfectly but you need to see it from my point of view which is within the Asian social mileau whereby the authoritative figure is the 'father figure' and that runs through the society with of course the head of the family, the father having a tight control over the k

RE: Environmental Challenges Predicted to Multiply in the 21st Century

1999-12-12 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Environmental Challenges Predicted to Multiply in the 21st Century By Cat Lazaroff WASHINGTON, DC, December 8, 1999 (ENS) - Some of the biggest environmental problems of recent years - dwindling fresh water supplies, damaged ecosystems and global warming - will continue to plague the world thro

RE: ECOFEM Changes: Please read!

1999-12-12 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Thank you EcoFem Coordinator! Eeling > -- > From: STEFANIE S. RIXECKER[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 10:43 AM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT > Subject: ECOFEM Changes: Please read! > > Dear All:

RE:

1999-12-13 Thread Wong Ee Ling
I mean it's not a name namelike ya family name? Never mind if you cannot disclose since you're an anarchist : ) > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 7:02 AM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN

RE: dealing with issues

1999-12-13 Thread Wong Ee Ling
ou say:' I, this individual, believe that .'. There are people who feels that unity is power therefore to solve a social issue, one has to go with the majority and there are people like myself who are bloody self-oriented and starts feeling the 'energy' in me and then dec

No Subject

1999-12-17 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Cd someone fwd this to Julia B. Hill: wd 'politicizing' the Redwoods conservation as if every tree is symbolic of a 'communist/leftist' that requires to be saved in some part of wth world, will actually help Julia's course or it will have not just the lumber company going for the Redwoods but also

hip-hip-hurray to Julia's triumph!

1999-12-20 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Tree-top-living environmental activist comes down to earth After living in an ancient redwood tree for two years, environmental activist Julia Hill came down to Earth again. She had perched there to protect the tree but ended her protest after reaching an agreement with her nemesis, the Pacifi

RE: Asia-EcoBest (for your use if applicable)

2000-02-08 Thread Wong Ee Ling
<> //www.riet.org/aeb/index.html Asia-EcoBest promotes European environmental best practices and business in Asia, operating through the autonomous Singapore-based Regional Institute of Environmental Technology (RIET). This commercially oriented public company was set up in 1993, in a combined

FW: Please Keep this Going

2000-04-12 Thread Wong Ee Ling
Usually I throw such emails away but since Niki Botha's case was reported in the news, it is not false. I apologize in advance if this email is not wanted If I understand the facts of the case correctly (and they are countless rape cases everyday in the African continent...), the rapist may