Re: re Women only

1998-09-08 Thread Brett and Kimberly
ber 08, 1998 6:14 PM Subject: Re: re Women only >Jake was not whining, as far as I am concerned. Why shouldn't anyone take >what you say seriously, bunny? Jake expresses something which concerns >him, a valid assessment, and your response is a joke? > >Hmm. Arlene >

Re: re Women only

1998-09-08 Thread Jake A Paisain
On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, bunny wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just being sarcastic at Jake's whining and whinging comments. I didn't > think anyone would take this seriously. Also, by leaving the planet, I did > not mean suicide - I meant by space shuttle or with the aliens or whatever. > M Calling my di

Re: re Women only

1998-09-08 Thread Arlene Plevin
Jake was not whining, as far as I am concerned. Why shouldn't anyone take what you say seriously, bunny? Jake expresses something which concerns him, a valid assessment, and your response is a joke? Hmm. Arlene On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, bunny wrote: > > Jake A Paisain "But if people keep disrespec

Re: Women only!

1998-09-08 Thread Jake A Paisain
> Jake A Paisain "But if people keep disrespecting me because of what's > between my legs I'm gonna quit this list." > > ++Gosh Jake, if men don't start treating me as an equal and if men don't stop > assuming that because I have breasts and can have babies that I am a second > class citizen to

Re: women only

1998-09-07 Thread Brianna Monroe
well said. I have never said anything on this list, I only joined because of my Women In Religion class at Columbia College. I was just about to unsubscribe because I was getting bored of all of the arguments back and forth about male bashing and women bashing. I hope this helps everyone to see

Re: Women only!

1998-09-06 Thread Jake A Paisain
I pick C too. But if people keep disrespecting me because of what's between my legs I'm gonna quit this list. jp On Sun, 6 Sep 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi! > > I know people are tired of talking aobut this but I was just thinking about it > this morning. What would you prefer peopl

Re Women only

1998-09-05 Thread bunny
Will writes- I think its fine for women to have women's only spaces if they feel the need. If calling men ( or whites or blacks or homos or whoever) assholes is the level of discorse that some women want to be on, then i for one would prefer that they go to that women's only space. Everybody has

Re Women only

1998-09-04 Thread Joe E. Dees
Date sent: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 08:16:41 +0800 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: bunny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re Women only > Will writes- >

Re: women only

1998-09-04 Thread will bason
> Women to blame for patriarchy -- yeah right, that's a good one. > This thought has come into my head over and over today: how blaming somebdy or some other group and avoiding any personal blame or responsability is giving away power. I think its fine for women to have women's only spaces if t

Re: women only/go for it!

1998-09-04 Thread Ecolady
In a message dated 98-09-04 11:29:07 EDT, you write: << There are many different paths. >> Hi Lori Anne, Thanks for your reply. I would like to see the bashing regarding men on the list end also - men should stay on the list and for those who have really have a need to have a male/free zone -

Re: women only

1998-09-04 Thread bd27594
No, Angela -- actually i am not into the "blame" language at all. I am just pointing out that what is happening on this list is quite reflective of what continually goes on "out there," namely the discussion has turned inot one about those "male-bashing" "man-blaming" feminists. Yet another red

Re: women only - A wakeup call!

1998-09-04 Thread Bertina Miller
Watch out Chris, I as a woman, also mentioned getting a new listserv for women only and I was bashed for doing so! Bertina On Fri, 4 Sep 1998, Chris King wrote: > >Anyway, what I am finding really really disheartening is the way that like so > >many other places in patriarchal culture women who

Re: women only

1998-09-04 Thread Ecolady
Sep 1998 15:25:28 +0200 From: "Maureen Devine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: women only Candi and Arlene, After many such debates I, too, have come around to the point of seeing exclusion of males as not automatically useful. In some situations it mig

Re: women only

1998-09-03 Thread Joe E. Dees
Date sent: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 19:19:10 -0600 (MDT) Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jake A Paisain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: women only O

Re: women only

1998-09-03 Thread Jake A Paisain
Hello all... It's interesting how many buttons I seem to push when I express my feelings on this list. I too am frustrated with the recent banter over this topic. It does nothing to bring us together in our efforts to hasten the ideals of ecofeminism into existence. There's been a lot of talk

RE: women only

1998-09-03 Thread Arlene Plevin
minating racism want a non-white space for once that they racist. > > Hope this sheds some light on the debate. > In solidarity, > Candi Churchill > -Original Message- > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 1998 10:29 AM > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT > Subject:

Re: women only

1998-09-03 Thread Ecolady
revealled to create the balance needed in the patriarchy reign. Love, Angela >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 3 10:40:36 1998 From: Candi Chruchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: women only Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 12