Re: Peer Review: was International Journal of Creation Research (IJCR).

2007-05-05 Thread William Silvert
I think that there are clear differences in the kinds of refereeing = standards that should be applied to different kinds of research, but at = present journals apply the same standards to all. Medical research is of = course an area where very careful testing, peer review, and replication = are

News: Conservatives Split Over Darwin and Evolution

2007-05-05 Thread Ashwani Vasishth
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/05/us/politics/05darwin.html?ref=science A Split Emerges as Conservatives Discuss Darwin By PATRICIA COHEN Published: May 5, 2007 Evolution has long generated bitter fights between the left and the right about whether God or science better explains the origins of

Fwd: FW: Be more willing to get a bloody nose in defense of reality!

2007-05-05 Thread adam herbert
not sure how far to take your metaphor about trouble down lower. but my point is that religion and science will always argue until there's realization that they are each different states of consciousness. the non-validative, salutary truths of religions need not argue with the sensorimotor,

Re: Inaugural Call for Papers for the International Journal of Creation Research (IJCR).

2007-05-05 Thread Edwin Cruz-Rivera
Hello all, As cynical as this may sound, I tend to agree with the person who said that people will believe whatever they want, regardless of the information available. The problem here is perception, and perception is shaped first by parents and family. In the case of religious folks (a

total station info

2007-05-05 Thread Eric North
A colleague and I use total stations frequently. We have another colleague in the USGS who is VERY knowledgeable in their application. He has worked in the Grand Canyon for many years. As for their portability, yeah it's not so good, but I've done huge hikes in and out of the canyon, in one

Come on guys, put up a fight!

2007-05-05 Thread Jim Sparks
Dear ESA, The debate about appropriate referee measures is very interesting but whether IJCR is editor or peer reviewed it will still be spreading a complete fallacy in a scientific format that is confusing to the public. I still think this merits being addressed directly as a specific issue by

Re: FW: Be more willing to get a bloody nose in defense of reality!

2007-05-05 Thread Jim Sparks
Okay, this is a good start. What I would suggest is that the ESA field a letter responding to IJCR by stating in, layman's terms, the critical difference between science and religion and why its important not to get confused and why IJCR is a threat to science and possibly even the democratic