Re: [ECOLOG-L] Leaving science?

2014-07-28 Thread Ruhl, Nathan
And there-in lies the problem. We expect young scientists to cut their teeth without pay. We expect "interns" to service our grants. We (scientists) are not independent to seek truth, wisdom, or knowledge we are married to the all-mighty grant-machine that may or may not spew-forth grant m

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Merits of invasion science

2013-10-29 Thread Ruhl, Nathan
When I first entered my PhD program I remember asking a few of the biology and geography faculty why they thought conservation biology and invasion biology were important fields of study. I was having trouble understanding why it was important to make sure a given ecosystem/community continued

Re: [ECOLOG-L] two suggestions re inundation by opinion pieces

2013-05-28 Thread Ruhl, Nathan
While 9 or 12 posts might not seem like much, those numbers are likely outliers when considering the number of posts most users make over the same period (zero!). I don't perceive this as a problem though. Anyone can authoritatively post to this list regardless of whether they really have th

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Confronting climate deniers on college campuses - EOS Forum

2012-07-03 Thread Ruhl, Nathan
When I first saw the title of this posting, I was immediately drawn to the word 'confronting'... and not in a positive way. I do not believe that it is necessary to 'confront' deniers. Confrontation breeds a defensive attitude, and being forced into a corner on a issue does not lead to rationa

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Invasion, or progression?

2012-04-22 Thread Ruhl, Nathan
I posed a very similar question to a group of graduate students and professors during a theoretical ecology seminar a few years ago. The central premise was that humans, by virtue of our innate-desire/ability to alter our surroundings, have caused a general decline in biodiversity globally. Th