Re: [edk2] [RFC] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License

2019-03-07 Thread Doran, Mark
Hi Kevin: I'm not a lawyer and even if I were I couldn't give you legal advice of course. That said, I believe the intent of the BSD+patent license is well stated in the note that is included immediately above the actual rendition of terms on this page here: https://opensource.org/licenses/BSDp

Re: [edk2] [patch 2/2] MdeModulePkg/BmBoot: Report status when fail to load/start boot option

2019-02-20 Thread Doran, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 1:25 AM > To: Ni, Ray ; Bi, Dandan > Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Wu, Hao A ; Doran, Mark > > Subject: Re: [edk2] [patch 2/2] MdeModulePkg/BmBoot: Report statu

Re: [edk2] Peripheral FW capsule delivery?

2019-02-05 Thread Doran, Mark
Hi Brad: One other possible path you might be able to consider. Have you looked at Component Firmware Update as a way to manage in-device firmware?? While that originates with Microsoft, it's open source and OS neutral and might be an easier overall. https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapp

[edk2] updated proposal for license changes

2019-02-01 Thread Doran, Mark
Hi Everyone: I hope this note finds everyone rested and back up to speed after the holidays! Or maybe I should say Happy New Year to those reading in Asia :) I wanted to follow up on the note I sent way back in October. Specifically I wanted to address the situation with Intel Contribution li

Re: [edk2] [RFC] Change EDK II to an Apache 2.0 License

2018-12-07 Thread Doran, Mark
Hi Mark: Forgive the manual formatting...I'm stuck with outlook ;) > -Original Message- > From: Mark Kettenis [mailto:mark.kette...@xs4all.nl] > Sent: Friday, December 7, 2018 1:45 PM [snip] > But the contributor agreement only applies for people that want to > contribute their code bac

[edk2] Changes to Intel contribution model

2018-10-02 Thread Doran, Mark
Hi Everyone: The way Intel's BIOS development community is organized has changed recently. This change presents opportunities to rethink some of the ways that we interact with the open source community around BIOS and this project in particular. In general, I believe Intel is interested in mo

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/62] Add FatPkg with 2-clause BSD license

2016-03-29 Thread Doran, Mark
> Subject: [PATCH 00/62] Add FatPkg with 2-clause BSD license > > I don't think sending all 62 patches will be useful (but, I can easily > send them out if requested). Instead, the patches are available at: > > web: https://github.com/jljusten/edk2/tree/fatpkg-open-source-v1 > > git: https://git