Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-20 Thread Gao, Liming
Subject: Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location? > > > > On May 19, 2016, at 8:18 PM, Gao, Liming wrote: > > > > Thanks Andrew. I will continue to investigate it. > > > > >>> F = 'FileNoExtention' > >>> os.path.splite

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-19 Thread Andrew Fish
bug is the `in` it should be `==` >>> '' == '.out' False Thanks, Andrew Fish >> -Original Message- >> From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com] >> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:01 AM >> To: Gao, Liming >> Cc: edk2-devel >> Subj

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-19 Thread Gao, Liming
Thanks Andrew. I will continue to investigate it. > -Original Message- > From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:01 AM > To: Gao, Liming > Cc: edk2-devel > Subject: Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location? &

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-19 Thread Andrew Fish
> On May 18, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Andrew Fish wrote: > >> >> On May 18, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Gao, Liming wrote: >> >> Andrew: >> |.bin will search the file with the postfix .bin in INF file directory and >> its output directory. So, there may be more than .bin files are found. >> Please see the c

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-18 Thread Andrew Fish
half Of Andrew > Fish > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:59 PM > To: Gao, Liming > Cc: edk2-devel > Subject: Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location? > > >> On May 18, 2016, at 7:24 AM, Gao, Liming wrote: >> >> Andrew: >> GenFds tool

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-18 Thread Gao, Liming
[mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Fish Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:59 PM To: Gao, Liming Cc: edk2-devel Subject: Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location? > On May 18, 2016, at 7:24 AM, Gao, Liming wrote: > > Andrew: > GenFds to

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-18 Thread Andrew Fish
rk in your case? Thanks, Andrew Fish > Thanks > Liming > -Original Message- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Andrew > Fish > Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:24 AM > To: edk2-devel > Subject: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverrid

Re: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-18 Thread Gao, Liming
Andrew Fish Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:24 AM To: edk2-devel Subject: [edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location? I'm trying to track down the code that processes the RuleOverride = BINARY, does anyone have a pointer? I'm porting the master BaseTools to our code ba

[edk2] [BaseTools] RuleOverride = BINARY code location?

2016-05-17 Thread Andrew Fish
I'm trying to track down the code that processes the RuleOverride = BINARY, does anyone have a pointer? I'm porting the master BaseTools to our code base and I'm hitting a size regression. One of the binary files is ending up with extra sections and I 'm trying to track down that logic. Thanks