Thanks for making a new title it'll be easier to track...
Andrew is right those have not changed in quite a long time and even if
they did since GdbSyms builds against current headers it won't matter.
Gcc builds the .dll files as a self contained binary which is passed
through GenFw which if need
Warning, first time contributor to this mailing list and new to EDK in general
so I apologize if I break any policies or norms for participation.
Probably should submit this as a possible defect but as yet have not resolved
how/where to get access to a defect tracker site (as referenced on the
On Apr 9, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Duane Voth wrote:
> previous thread was: [edk2] OVMF networking revisited
> Spliting off this gdb+qemu+ovmf debugging discussion.
> Versions:
> qemu-kvm 1.2.0
> gdb 7.5.1
> OVMF X64 built on Linux with GCC 4.6
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Joe Vern
previous thread was: [edk2] OVMF networking revisited
Spliting off this gdb+qemu+ovmf debugging discussion.
Versions:
qemu-kvm 1.2.0
gdb 7.5.1
OVMF X64 built on Linux with GCC 4.6
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Joe Vernaci wrote:
> ...
> The error you are seeing means gdb does not
On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Rafael Machado
wrote:
> The only point I imagine is that there is a possibility of some application
> fail if it alocates the first page returned by the GetMemoryMap function even
> with this page being of type Desc->Type == EfiConventionalMemory And this
> seems
The only point I imagine is that there is a possibility of some application
fail if it alocates the first page returned by the GetMemoryMap function
even with this page being of type Desc->Type == EfiConventionalMemory And
this seems to be possible when CSM is disabled.
Should I disconsider the fi
On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Rafael Machado
wrote:
> I think I was not clear. I didn't add all information
> The first step at the application is to get the MemoryMap
> (gBS->GetMemoryMap), and after that, alocate the pages of the first block I
> can access Based on the description of that pa
I think I was not clear. I didn't add all information
The first step at the application is to get the MemoryMap
(gBS->GetMemoryMap), and after that, alocate the pages of the first block I
can access Based on the description of that page if Desc->Type ==
EfiConventionalMemory
The problem seems tha
On Apr 9, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Rafael Machado
wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for the answer.
> It's strange the the application allocated these addresses.
> These seems to be at the BDA right ? They should not be allocated.
>
> At the application I use several calls to:
>
> gBS->AllocatePoo
Hi Andrew
Thanks for the answer.
It's strange the the application allocated these addresses.
These seems to be at the BDA right ? They should not be allocated.
At the application I use several calls to:
gBS->AllocatePool(EfiBootServicesData,
sizeof(EFI_MEMORY_BLOCKS),
(VOID**) &MemoryBlocks);
Thanks Andrew and Laszlo.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi Sateesh,
>
> On 04/09/13 16:22, satish kondapalli wrote:
>
> > My PCIe device option ROM driver registers BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL on PCIe
> > device. I successfully booted ubuntu OS from my pcie device. But
> > Ce
On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Rafael Machado
wrote:
> After some debug here comes the question.
> Why am I able to allocated more memory when csm is off ?
Because the CSM allocates memory when it runs.
>
> Does uefi have some kind of virtual memory ?
Not generally. For X64 and ARM paging is
On Apr 9, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Vishnuvardhan Reddy
wrote:
> Hi,
> Appreciated your supports.
> Could you please help me out to know about the how nested firmware volumes
> (FV) concept work in general
How FVs work is fully defined in the UEFI Platform Initialization Specification
1.2.1 availabl
Hi Sateesh,
On 04/09/13 16:22, satish kondapalli wrote:
> My PCIe device option ROM driver registers BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL on PCIe
> device. I successfully booted ubuntu OS from my pcie device. But
> CentOS failed to boot. Centos is using GRUB one boot loader.
(I'll assume you mean CentOS 6.4.)
After some debug here comes the question.
Why am I able to allocated more memory when csm is off ?
Does uefi have some kind of virtual memory ?
Thanks and Regards
Rafael R. Machado
2013/4/9 Rafael Machado
> Hi everyone
>
>
> I'm having some problems with an uefi application that works perfec
Sateesh,
If you make a child handle you can add the device path to that, along with your
Block IO protocol. The device path would be the device path from the PCI IO
protocol with the vendor device path appended to it.
An EFI driver that produces a child handle is called a bus driver. You can r
Hi everyone
I'm having some problems with an uefi application that works perfectly when
CSM (Compatibility Support Module) is enabled but doesn't work when CSM is
off.
At the application I have a big array allocated to store some data.
When CSM is on I have:
current address: 00066FF8
Hi,
My PCIe device option ROM driver registers BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL on PCIe
device. I successfully booted ubuntu OS from my pcie device. But CentOS
failed to boot. Centos is using GRUB one boot loader.
My driver is similar to OVMF VirtioBlk driver and i found one bug in
redhat site.
https://b
On 04/09/13 00:38, Duane Voth wrote:
> So gdb => qemu: I can single step and get/set cpu regs, but I can't set
> breakpoints or step over subroutines... does qemu 1.2 support
> breakpoints? (anything to make this easier!)
You need the debug symbols for the qemu binary. Your distro may provide
th
Hi,
Appreciated your supports.
Could you please help me out to know about the how nested firmware volumes
concept work in general in efi and how to identify the modules present in
nested firmware volumes.
Thanks & regards,
Vishnu
The contents of this e-mail and
Hi,
I found a bug, where autocomplete doesn't work for files beginning with
"cd" and typing "cd" in the shell.
Filtering for the following space makes the autocomplete work with files
and if you type the space, autocomplete is also working for folders.
I don't know how to apply patches to the pr
21 matches
Mail list logo
