Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 06/08/15 20:00, Jordan Justen wrote: > On 2015-06-08 00:51:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 06/07/15 06:51, Jordan Justen wrote: >>> On 2015-06-05 16:47:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated my grey matter): - Patch #1 c

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-06-08 00:51:27, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 06/07/15 06:51, Jordan Justen wrote: > > On 2015-06-05 16:47:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated > >> my grey matter): > >> > >> - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Gabriel L. Somlo
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:58:48AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Entire series: > > Tested-by: Gabriel Somlo > > (with OOT sata patches, on pc and q35 machine types, with yosemite and > > Fedora 21 live, boots and runs same as before, no additional/specific > > torture tests). > > Did you add /

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/06/2015 01:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > This half of the series would actually apply to > PcAtChipsetPkg/PciHostBridgeDxe itself, and it would be possible to > clone the driver for OvmfPkg only at the end of the first half. Yes, please... :) Paolo

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 06/06/15 03:30, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 01:47:40AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated >> my grey matter): >> >> - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg to OvmfPkg. I >> paid attention a

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-08 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 06/07/15 06:51, Jordan Justen wrote: > On 2015-06-05 16:47:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated >> my grey matter): >> >> - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg to OvmfPkg. > > Arg. After I have bugged the DuetPkg an

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-06 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2015-06-05 16:47:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated > my grey matter): > > - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg to OvmfPkg. Arg. After I have bugged the DuetPkg and CorebootPayloadPkg package owners to try to fix

Re: [edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-05 Thread Gabriel L. Somlo
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 01:47:40AM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated > my grey matter): > > - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg to OvmfPkg. I > paid attention and passed the --find-copies-harder option to >

[edk2] [PATCH 00/21] OvmfPkg: support extra PCI root buses

2015-06-05 Thread Laszlo Ersek
The first 9 patches are uninteresting (although they certainly decimated my grey matter): - Patch #1 copies PciHostBridgeDxe from PcAtChipsetPkg to OvmfPkg. I paid attention and passed the --find-copies-harder option to git-format-patch, hence reviewers should be able to spot the minimal dif