Amen.
Start with the question to be answered. Then look at the situation -
factors, desired response, methods of measuring (operational
definitions, OK?) Maybe then we can look around and see what sort of
design will fit, and whether we can move the situation toward a specific
design. It's
Alas, there are no good books. I can recommend
sections from various ones, but there is nothing
that puts it all together. The best, is the first
part of Atkinson and Donev, which is at the right
level, but doesn't cover enough material. Scheffé
is very good, as is Kempthorne and Cochran and
Cox,
DENNIS ROBERTS WRITES -
- Original Message -
From: "dennis roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Experimental Design Text Advice
> At 10:49 AM 1/18/01 -0600, Ken K. wrote:
> >I find BH&H to be quite good, but a lit
At 10:49 AM 1/18/01 -0600, Ken K. wrote:
>I find BH&H to be quite good, but a little hard to read and getting a little
>dated. I much prefer "Design and Analysis of Experiments" by Douglas C.
>Montgomery, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-52000-4
>
>I really like the simple style Montogomery uses in a
Hello:
It has come to our attention that Statgraphics Version 5, the latest,
web-enabled version of our software, is not included in your list. We would
be grateful if you would kindly consider it. Our FREE, fully functional
time-limited DEMO can be downloaded for evaluation. We are extremely
con
I find BH&H to be quite good, but a little hard to read and getting a little
dated. I much prefer "Design and Analysis of Experiments" by Douglas C.
Montgomery, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-52000-4
I really like the simple style Montogomery uses in all his books
.
Ken
"Bertil Runström" <[EMAIL
Hello:
It has come to our attention that Statgraphics Version 5, the latest,
web-enabled version of our software, is not included in your list. We would
be grateful if you would kindly add it to your list. Our FREE, fully
functional time-limited DEMO can be downloaded for evaluation.
Our web sit
dennis roberts wrote:
>
> > > >37. When Matt's and Damien's broad jumps were measured accurately to
> > > >the nearest foot, each measurement was 21 feet. Which statement best
> > > >describes the greatest possible difference in the lengths of Matt¹s
> > > >jump and Damien's jump?
> > > >A. One
> > >37. When Matt's and Damien's broad jumps were measured accurately to
> > >the nearest foot, each measurement was 21 feet. Which statement best
> > >describes the greatest possible difference in the lengths of Matt¹s
> > >jump and Damien's jump?
> > >A. One jump could be up to 1/4 foot longe
Hi David,
A very good book is "Statistics for Experimenters", Box, Hunter and Hunter.
John Wiley and Sons. ISBN 0-471-09315-7
Kind regards
Bertil Runström
"David Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
tju96.617$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:tju96.617$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I would love to find
10 matches
Mail list logo
