Student's t vs. z tests

2001-04-20 Thread Alan Zaslavsky
(This note is largely in support of points made by Rich Ulrich and Paul Swank.) I disagree with the claim (expressed in several recent postings) that z-tests are in general superseded by t-tests. The t-test (in simple one-sample problems) is developed under the assumption that independent observ

Re: Student's t vs. z tests

2001-04-20 Thread Jon Cryer
Alan: Could you please give us an example of such a situation? ">Consider first a set of measurements taken with >a measuring instrument whose sampling errors have a known standard >deviation (and approximately normal distribution)." Jon At 01:10 PM 4/20/01 -0400, you wrote: >(This note is lar

Re: Student's t vs. z tests

2001-04-20 Thread Jon Cryer
Alan: I don't understand your comments about the estimation of a proportion. It sounds to me as if you are using the estimated standard error. (Surely you are not assuming a known standard error.) You are presumably, also using the normal approximation to the binomial (or perhaps the hypergeometr

Re: ANCOVA vs. sequential regression

2001-04-20 Thread Paul Swank
I agree. ANCOVA is often said to be used when the groups are not experimental. It is a linear model of the same nature as ACOVA but technically ANCOVA refers to the experimental situation. The general linear model would allow comparing the groups while controlling for X but as William says, you sho