Elliot Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in sci.stat.edu:
Sima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have missed some lectures on statistics due to heavy illness
: and now i got an assignment which i cannot solve.
We all feel sorry for you Sima, but perhaps you should talk to your
instructor about it. He
[cc'd to previous poster]
Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in sci.stat.edu:
I think I could not blame students for floundering about on this one.
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:39:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stan Brown)
wrote:
The manufacturer of a patent medicine claims that it is 90%
[cc'd to previous poster; please follow up in newsgroup]
Robert J. MacG. Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
sci.stat.edu:
Stan Brown wrote:
The manufacturer of a patent medicine claims that it is 90%
effective(*) in relieving an allergy for a period of 8 hours. In a
sample of 200 people who
Stan Brown wrote:
I would respectfully suggest that the OP _first_ carefully study the
textbook sections that correspond to the missed lectures, get notes from
a classmate
This part is of doubtful usefulness.
, and _then_ contact the instructor to fill in any remaining gaps or
answer any
Beth Clarkson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm looking for some sources on how to compute survival rates and
remaining life determinations. In particular, I'd like to find
information on the Iowa type survivor curves and the retirement rate
method. This is
At 06:13 PM 12/1/01 -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
Jon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in sci.stat.edu:
Stan Brown wrote:
I would respectfully suggest that the OP _first_ carefully study the
textbook sections that correspond to the missed lectures, get notes from
a classmate
This part is
i think this points out that it is hard to really give good responses
sometimes when all the details are not known ... in this case, we really
don't have sufficient information on HOW samples were selected and
assigned, METHODS and orders that items were heated and then porcelain
applied, and
Who was the first to say Correlation does not imply causation in so many
words? I know that the idea dates back to David Hume, but Hume did his
work about a century before the term correlation acquired its modern
statitical meaning. I've seen many sources that crdit Karl Pearson with
banishing
