A NEW Electronic BOOK on STATISTICS!
Dear Colleagues,
We are sending you the following announcement of a new book publication
of Prof. Dr. Victor Aladjev and believe you could be interested in this
subject matter. If you or your colleagues are not interested in this
publication, simply
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dennis Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry for late reply
ranking is the LEAST useful thing you can do ... so, i would never START
with simple ranks
any sort of an absolute kind of scale ... imperfect as it is ... would
generally be better ...
You can say that
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:00:06 +0100, Jos Jansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich Ulrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:33:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Jukka Sinisalo) wrote:
We have two pots with 25 plants each.
The Gallup organization posted a video to explain why the the increase in
black's job approval for Bush is 'proportionate' to the increase among whites.
Both increased by about 30% (60 to 90 for whites, mid thirties to roughly 70%
for blacks), so the increase is proportionate, not
there are two sets of data ... one for georgeDUBU ... and the elder george bush
here is what i glean from the charts
for george w ... the EVENT was sept 11 ... for the elder george bush ...
the EVENT was the gulf war ... and both were before and after ratings
1. whites approval rating for
His definition of proportionate would mean that if a group's approval of Bush
went from 1% to 31%, that too would be proportionate. The relative odds would
be one way of expressing the changes in proportions, but the absolute
difference (60% to 90% is roughly propotionate to an increase from 33%
