ÎÒÃdzÏÒâÌṩ¹ã¶«µØÇø¼ÛÁ®ÓÅÖʼ¯×°ÏäÍϳµ·þÎñ
ÎÒÃÇÊÇÃÀ¹úNSL¹ú¼Ê»õÔË´úÀí¹«Ë¾ÊôϹãÖÝ»ÆÆҸ۵ļ¯×°Ïä³µ¶Ó£¬³¤ÆÚÒÔÀ´ÎÒÃǶ¼ÊÇÒÔ·þÎñ±¾µØµÄ½ø³ö¿ÚÆóÒµ¼°²¿·ÖÄÚó¿ÍÉÌΪÖ÷¡£×¼Ê±¡¢×¨Òµ¡¢³Ðŵ¡¢ÐÅÓþ¡¢·þÎñ¼°ºÏÀíµÄ¼ÛǮһֱÒÔÀ´¶¼ÊÇÎÒÃǾӪµÄ×ÚÖ¼ºÍÉúÃüÏß¡£Îª´Ë£¬ÎÒÃÇÉèÓÐרÃŵķþÎñ¼°Í¶ËßרÏߣ¬ÓÉרÈËΪÿ¸ö²»Í¬µÄ¿Í»
µÚ¶þ½ìÕã½¹ú¼ÊÄ£¾ß¼¼ÊõÉ豸չÀÀ»á
Õã ½ ¹ú ¼Ê Êý ¿Ø »ú ´² Õ¹ ÀÀ »á
ʱ¼ä£º2002Äê6ÔÂ17ÈÕ-20ÈÕ
µØµã£ºº¼ÖÝ Õã½ÊÀ½çóÒ×ÖÐÐÄ
Ö÷°ìµ¥Î»£ºÖйú»úеÉ豸½ø³ö¿Ú×ܹ«Ë¾
³Ð°ìµ¥Î»£ºÎ÷Âó¿Ë¹ú¼ÊÕ¹ÀÀÓÐÏÞÔðÈι«Ë¾
º¼ÖÝÍû×åÕ¹ÀÀ·þÎñÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
Õ¹ÀÀÈÕÆÚ: 2002Äê6ÔÂ17ÈÕ-20ÈÕ
²ÎÕ¹·¶Î§:
Ò»¡¢Ä£¾ß¼¼ÊõºÍÉ
In article ,
Donald Macnaughton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At great length, and with many quotes, on a very interesting topic. I
fear I may have missed the original postings on this thread, though.
There is however one area that seems not to have been addressed.
On 17 Jan 2002 00:05:02 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Håkon) wrote:
> I have noticed a practice among some people dealing with enterprise
> data to cut the left and right tails off their samples (including
> census data) in both dependent and independent variables. The reason
> is that outliers tend
http://askearth.com/go/view_request?request=5058
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
==
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 10:52:30 +0100, "Huxley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Uzytkownik "Gottfried Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisal w wiadomosci
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > It's not so simple. You have to do matrix-inversion for
> > that.
> >
> Not simple? I heard that ta
I am trying to use the S-Plus library, MIX (by Schafer) to create
multiple data sets (the original data set has missing values). I have
a problem in understanding the use of the "margins" vector which has
to be submitted to the program when using the restricted general
location model.
I "seem" t
Huxley schrieb:
>
> Uzytkownik "Gottfried Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisal w wiadomosci
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > It's not so simple. You have to do matrix-inversion for
> > that.
> >
> Not simple? I heard that taking suitable factor loadings and every variable
> mean I
Verba Volant 29-01-02,
Every day a new quotation translated into many languages.
_
Quotation of the day:
Author - Jonathan
Swift
English - we have just enough
religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one
another
Italian -
abbiamo abbastanza religione per
odiarci
What you need is a program that makes biplots for principal
components. ViSta, a freeware program, will do it for you. In facti,
it includes examples of data about cars and the goal of the analysis
is to visualize them in the space of the variables.
Pedro
> It's not so simple. You have to d
Uzytkownik "Gottfried Helms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisal w wiadomosci
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It's not so simple. You have to do matrix-inversion for
> that.
>
Not simple? I heard that taking suitable factor loadings and every variable
mean I can obtain this space. e.g. (I
Title: ÐÂÆ·Ô¤¶¨--ÇÀ£¡ÇÀ£¡ÇÀ£¡
ÄÐÊ¿ÄÚÒµêÐÂÆ·Ô¤¶¨ÖС¡
http://www.51neiku.com
SHOW YOUR TALENTS SHOW
YOURSELF
It's not so simple. You have to do matrix-inversion for
that.
If your statistical program is able to spit out "factor scores",
you just take these as your coordinates. For each of your objects
you get values in each factor, which you can use as coordinates
in the factorspace.
Regards -
Gottf
Thank you for explanation. Bu my question was unclear therefore let me ask
again. I invented an exapmle.
I have 10 questions in a questionnaire. These questions are my 10 variables.
A consumers fill this questionnaire for each 15 products e.g cars. Because
10 variables (X1, X2, ...,X10) are corre
14 matches
Mail list logo