Is there any optimality or other reason for the choice of the two below
distances?
There are surely many other possibilities (e.g. Mallow's distance), which,
however,
might not be as appropriate, but at the moment I do not see any reasoning.
Could you please comment/advise on this?
TIA
Robert N
¿ìÀÖµÄѧÎÊ
Äã¸Ä±ä²»ÁË»·¾³£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒԸıä×Ô¼º£»
Äã¸Ä±ä²»ÁËÊÂʵ£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒԸıä̬¶È£»
Äã¸Ä±ä²»Á˹ýÈ¥£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒԸıäÏÖÔÚ£»
Äã²»ÄÜ¿ØÖÆËûÈË£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒÔÕÆÎÕ×Ô¼º£»
Äã²»ÄÜÔ¤²âÃ÷Ì죬µ«Äã¿ÉÒÔ°ÑÎÕ½ñÌ죻
Äã²»ÄÜÑùÑù˳Àû£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒÔÊÂʾ¡ÐÄ£»
Äã²»ÄÜ×óÓÒÌìÆø£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒԸıäÐÄÇ飻
Äã²»ÄÜÑ¡ÔñÈÝò£¬µ«Äã¿ÉÒÔÕ¹ÏÖЦÈÝ£»
nikolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i want to test the difference between two proportions. The problem is that
> some elements of these proportions are dependent (i can not isolate them).
> That is, the t-statistics does not work. How could i do? Do other kind of
> tests exist? Is there a book o
hello,
i want to test the difference between two proportions. The problem is that
some elements of these proportions are dependent (i can not isolate them).
That is, the t-statistics does not work. How could i do? Do other kind of
tests exist? Is there a book or a paper on the subject?
Thank you
J. Random Loser in Dnepropetrowsk wrote:
>
> The "Listsoft & Co" company offers save your money.
> We prepositionals the softwere.
Ah. That really fills me with confidence.
The are :
>
> 1. MS WINDOWS 2000 PROFESSIONAL + (SERVICE PACK 2)- 1C
Herman Rubin wrote:
>
>
> I would tend to reject any book which does data analysis;
> I consider cookbook statistics to be putting a loaded gun
> in the hands of an someone who is totally ignorant about
> guns; not necessarily an idiot, as the idiot cannot learn.
> For data analysis, change "gu
