Hi,
i calculate some calculations for a specific target variable.
People should rate for 3 things some independends and one dependend
variable. People should not difference in importances as possible
between the 1.,2.and the 3.Chose.
Now i filter all people which rate the same thing (i.e. a
Rich Ulrich wrote:
I've always done this in SPSS (6.1 and earlier) with
ANOVA vara by grps(1,4) with covar/
Likewise.
However, as I'm in a funny mood, it occurred to me that you could
use the residuals from correlating the covariates with the separate
grooup scores as input to a
Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:55:42 +1100, Glen Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
A straight line CDF would imply the data is
Let me take a (somewhat) contrarian position to those previously
expressed. An experiment is any test of a hypothesis. An experiment can
involve the use of observational (unmanipulated) data, as long as the
hypothesis is clearly stated prior to the collection of the data. While
it is true that an
Hi,
This research deals with the classical anthropological question of
food sharing among hunters and gatherers. There are a number of
hypotheses being discussed within the field. This study is relevant
for two models, namely kinship cooperation and reciprocity. The
kinship model predicts
Hi,
I'm CS student interested in Radford Neal thesis called Bayesian
Learning for Neural Networks. I know that some years ago this thesis
was available for download from author's site, but nowadays there
isn't possible. I have searched it on Intenet so I have not known to
find it.
I should be
On 19 Feb 2002 15:14:01 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trevor Bond)
wrote:
[ snip, much ]
affected who won the gold medal. In fact, Looney (1994, p. 156)
concluded:
all of the judges with an Eastern block or communistic background
not only ranked Baiul better than expected, but ranked
Title: RE: SPC control limits
Jay Warner writes:
The 'party line' is to take the first 30 or so points, calculate
limits, throw out any outside ones add more at the end, until you
have 30 points, all of which are inside the control limits.
Actually, I have heard the opposite.
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 00:27:00 +1100, Glen Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:55:42 +1100, Glen Barnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
SSCHEINE wrote:
Let me take a (somewhat) contrarian position to those previously
expressed. An experiment is any test of a hypothesis. An experiment can
involve the use of observational (unmanipulated) data, as long as the
hypothesis is clearly stated prior to the collection of the data.
Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I was trying to suggest that he meant the slope of the CDF was the
height of the PDF.
Oh, okay. Yes, that would be correct, but it shouldn't be called probability!
Glen
Hi all, many further thanks for the help I recently received on setting
up data for repeated measures analysis, thanks to the help I got here I
have been able to do that analysis.
A further question: it seems one could come up with justifications for
several ways to compute outliers in a
--=_4D48010B15E006082AA0
Content-Description: filename=text1.txt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
HP48G, HP49G, MAPLE, SCILAB BOOKS AT BARGAIN PRICES
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
Jim said "Reaction time outliers are most often due to
distraction or a missed cue, so that it is usually not necessary to individually
justify excluding each single outlier."
While this may be common practice, you should keep in mind
that it is possible that your experimental treatment
Inasmuch as the objective is to 'drain the swamp' - reduce product
process variation, I find that in practice Wheeler's suggestion of focus
on causes of that variation is on the mark. the procedure from the
old Ford Manual, and I believe the 6th 7th Ed. of Grant Leavenworth,
puts the focus on
15 matches
Mail list logo