practices.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=
of their findings. Was there a
single final report?
I'm not looking to re-start anything long or divisive. I'm just
looking for a reference to something that pulled together
findings.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and leaving
in a
different ballpark than before. I've never said that Barry's HRs
are entirely due to playing in Pac Bell (though I do remind you
that he's hit 31 there so far this year). My main point was and
still is that the Slate author used RTM in a sloppy way. That's
what I meant by cavalier.
--Robert Chung
Rich Ulrich wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 21:32:02 +0200, Robert Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ snip, earlier comments on Barry Bonds's home runs,
then at 56, now at 63.]
Hmmm. I would have suggested that Pac Bell Park was much more
conducive to a power-hitting lefty than
to the mean (and comments that Bonds
has never before hit 50) might be more relevant if all other
conditions were constant. They ain't.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem
mately equal. But it's still
there, which is what Elliot Cramer was saying. If we regressed, say,
income on education, we'd observe the same effect, viz., that our
predicted income for a given level of education is closer to the mean
income (in standardized units) than the level of ed
"J. Williams" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would be interested in research showing voter intentions in those
western counties AFTER learning the election had been already called.
It would be fascinating to find out what the exit pollsters
of hand counts
being able to produce an additional thousand votes for Gore,
but since this is a stat discussion and not a political one
I'm going to refrain from sharing it.
--Robert Chung
"Bob Wheeler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECT
ay
be quite subtle, but then the differences are pretty small,
too.
Alternatively, maybe there really *is* cheating going on. This
could be part of a discussion with students, too.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and
"Rich Ulrich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Oh! that's interesting. I was picturing the *cards* as the source of
variance.
Even if manufacturing control is
good, I bet that a dry-and-crisp card is voted with fewer errors than
a card
of expertise in estimating the effect. That would be true
whether the vote difference in Florida were 100 votes, 1000 votes,
or 100,000 votes (though it certainly is more interesting when the
race is close).
--Robert Chung
Or perhaps things are done
differently in Florida than elsewhere? I take it from your
e-mail address that you know more about Florida than I.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
ership in the county I think it disingenuous to believe
there's no evidence of *error*.
--Robert Chung
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=
13 matches
Mail list logo
