uot;, a valid statement?
I emphasize to my student's, and also believe, that an experiment cannot "prove"
anything. Rather, the results provide support for or against a premise.
It is not easy to pose a question nor make a statement that cannot be misinterpre
want to test for >, so as not to dispense too much.
A <> (not equal to) test claims only that the amount dispensed is not
correct. For example. a ball-bearing must be neither too large not too
small.
Stu
Garfield High School
Los Angeles, CA
>
>
> Janne
>
> ===
read and books don't make people kill.
There are many such examples. My favorites involve time series, for example,
hat size and shoe size (birth to adult); hair length and weight (birth to age
1); and those with a third factor, for example, temperature and electric bill.
Stu
Garfiel
upport.
Absolutely. Without both a working hypothesis and a literature search one could
say that cancer causes cigarette smoking.
Stu
Garfield High School
Los Angeles
--- End Message ---
