reviewers comment was
something like Why on earth would anyone want to use GEE's for such a
simple design. Hmm.
Warren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (SR Millis) wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In November's issue of the American Statistician, Yang Tsiatis discuss
the use of generalized
a Bonferroni approach would work
okay here. There are various methods of computing the intervals, but
I would suggest a Wilson-type interval. (For a discussion, see the
2000 issue of the Journal of Statistical Software that discusses
setting CI's for the multinomial)
Warren May
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I don't feel MM's are any more trivial to introduce the concepts than
the usual chips in an urn or balls from a jar. And I don't agree
that using MMs is trivial or juvenile. My class has basic science
grad students, M.D.s, Health professionals of all types and they do
seem to get something from
you explain?
Thanks,
Warren
=
Instructions for joining and leaving this list and remarks about
the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES are available at
http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/
=
Rafael,
Is this homeworks?
You're on the right track...you either need a separate guess for the
probability of success or you need an estimate from a sample.
Is there an even chance of turning right or left?
Are you a classicist, a frequentist or a subjectivist?
:)
Warren
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm using Daniel's book too. I've used it for the last couple of
years, switching from Glantz Primer. The 7th edition still has quite
a few
errors, but I like it for some of the exercises.
Would love to be on your mailing list.
Warren
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Hamer) wrote in message
news
since 1950,
the number of American children gunned down has doubled.
This quotation is my nomination for a dubious distinction: I think it may be
the worst -- that is, the most inaccurate -- social statistic ever.
Full text:
http://chronicle.com/free/v47/i34/34b00701.htm
--
Warren S. Sarle
do?
|
| Thanks in advance,
| Irina.
|
--
Warren F. KuhfeldSAS Institute Inc. (919) 677-8000 x17922
Multivariate Models RD Cary, NC 27513-2414 (919) 677- (Fax)
R5116 SAS Campus Dr. www.sas.com The power to know
Opinions expressed here are mine and not necessarily those
than a thousand dollar increase at the high end of the
scale.
See the discussion of log-interval scales in
ftp://ftp.sas.com/pub/neural/measurement.html
--
Warren S. Sarle SAS Institute Inc. The opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED]SAS Campus Drive are mine
%. And since the margin could be
either +0.5% or -0.5%, disputes would happen roughly twice as
often.
--
Warren S. Sarle SAS Institute Inc. The opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED]SAS Campus Drive are mine and not necessarily
(919) 677-8000Cary, NC 27513, USA those
development and operation.
And the desire for voter privacy is fundamentally in conflict with any
requirements for accountability (e.g., audit trails).
In the Florida case, we still have to wait for the absentee ballots, and any
possible further recounts in other states.
--
Warren S. Sarle
. If you did McNemar's test on pixels, it
would not be valid due to spatial correlation.
Follow-ups set to sci.stat.consult
--
Warren S. Sarle SAS Institute Inc. The opinions expressed here
[EMAIL PROTECTED]SAS Campus Drive are mine and not necessarily
(919) 677-8000Cary
have demos that
you might check. SPSS sent me a really nice SYSTAT CD with a bunch of
other Jandelly looking software like SigmaStat, etc. SPSS also has a
grad pack for a great price if you are a student. NCSS has a free
download that includes PASS.
Warren May
remember correctly. I think it might be like the old IMSL library...you
can't run the code without having ENTISOFT. Bummer.
www.entisoft.com
Luck,
Warren
Clay Fink wrote:
I am reverse engineering a piece of software that was implemented in
SAS. It uses the BETAINV function to compute the upper
to a computer with some REAL software is the
way to go. The $300 US you pay for a calculator will go a long way on
software (SPSS had a grad pack that was an awesome deal...hope they
still have it).
Warren May
Donald Macnaughton wrote:
Stefanie Dzierzon writes (on 00/5/13)
I am studying
In article 002501bfb563$e8e6e8e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David A. Heiser) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Herman Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: no correlation assumption among X's in MLR
In
for subject specialists.
Also, if I remember correctly you want to use 2 alpha instead of alpha for
constructing the CI.
Warren.
Rich Ulrich wrote:
(posted to sci.stat.consult,sci.stat.edu, where version of the same
post by Wang appeared.)
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 15:51:47 +0800, Ng Tsz Wang
e form of
multimedia...slides, overheads, etc. Afterwards, we open the floor for
discussion focusing on the statistical methods and results. Lots of great
opportunities (and sometimes exam questions) come from these discussions.
Anxious to hear how others feel about projects.
Warren
dennis robe
something without the aid of a
bookshelf full of reference materials?
I do feel plugging numbers into the formulaes is beneficial, but this might be
better handled with out of class assignments. Depends again on what you want to
test...computation or concept.
Warren
"T.S. Lim" wrote:
antly different from
zero is it? Your larger sample will allow you to estimate the mean with more
precision. (I'm not sure that I agree that larger samples are more problematic
from the terms of missing data than smaller samples...that's a problem with
study design, not sample size.)
Warren Ma
about our statistical software and download evaluation versions
(http://www.kovcomp.com/).
--
Dr. Warren L. Kovach
Kovach Computing Services
85 Nant-y-Felin, Pentraeth, Anglesey
Wales LL75 8UY U.K.
Tel.: +44-1248-450414 | Fax
Thom Baguley wrote:
christophe tourenq wrote:
I am a biologist (definitely not a statistician) in France with very
limited access to statistical resources and I wonder if someone can give
me some advice. I have been conducting weekly bird counts in wetland
areas for a period of 1
22 matches
Mail list logo
