Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-05-23 Thread Bill Watkins
I believe the author that Ellen quoted was referring to MCS and, if so, I agree with that author. IMHO, there will eventually be MCS software that will allow high school students to run circles around what today's PhDs do with closed form solutions. William Chambers wrote: > Ellen, > > It amaze

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-05-13 Thread Will Dwinnell
William Chambers wrote: "It amazes me to read the self-righteous judgements of people on this thread.. a number of whom have made incompetent criticisms of corresponding correlations with the same arrogance and stupidity that they attribute to the data mining boys, ..." As one of the 'data mining

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-05-04 Thread Konrad Freeman
"Data Mining" is a loosely and vaguely defined term that refers to things that people do to understand and explore data. It means different things when used by different people. It may mean one of the following: 1. Classical data analysis/statistical modeling such as linear regression. 2. AI st

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-05-01 Thread Richard M. Barton
An example of specialized knowledge: Last Friday, a colleague showed me how he was using a data mining program to cluster over 1000 genes using 5 variables. After clustering, he used the program to generate a pretty, spinnable 3-D plot of his data on 3 of the original variables. It had colo

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-30 Thread William Chambers
Ellen, It amazes me to read the self-righteous judgements of people on this thread.. a number of whom have made incompetent criticisms of corresponding correlations with the same arrogance and stupidity that they attribute to the data mining boys, When the purpose becomes making money and not pu

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-30 Thread Donald F. Burrill
Thanks, Ellen. Evocative quote, isn't it? It's that "without requiring *any* (!) specialized knowledge" that will be the dangerous part, if read too literally by the naive. Interesting that you could get to Lim's URL at all. When _I _ tried it, several days ago, the system seemed t

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-29 Thread Ellen Hertz
I looked up one and copied it: "For the first time, thanks to the increased power of computers, new methods replace the skill of the statistical artisan with massive-computational methods, obtaining equal or better results in far less time without requiring any specialised knowledge." In

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-29 Thread Bob Hayden
- Forwarded message from Frank E Harrell Jr - I'd like to make a somewhat related point. There are many educational tools that I've found have a great effect on non-statisticians. One if these is to take one of their datasets, randomly permute the column of Y-values, go through their da

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-29 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
ROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 7:52 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects > > > > ...And it extends even further. Many of us who toil in areas outside of > > academia have o

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects (fwd)

2000-04-28 Thread Bob Hayden
- Forwarded message from Debasmit Mohanty - I think, now is the time when we have to decide "Do we accept DATA MINING as a part of statistics or do we keep neglecting this field as before". I am sure there would be few statistics students like me who feel that Data Mining is very much

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-28 Thread Debasmit Mohanty
I have been following the discussion on Data Mining blooper for a while. Being a first year graduate student in statistics, my comments on this issue might sound premature. Nevertheless, I would put forward my observations. What I have learnt so far from my interaction with the statisticians

RE: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-28 Thread Silvert, Henry
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 7:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects > > ...And it extends even further. Many of us who toil in areas outside of > academia have our wor

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-28 Thread mtwyatt
...And it extends even further. Many of us who toil in areas outside of academia have our work and productivity "supervised" by managers or directors who have little or no training in statistics, beyond a survey course. They receive the flashy brochures and read the ads that promise analytical sof

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-27 Thread Frank E Harrell Jr
They are amazingly misleading. A basic stat book will explain why. One example is the statement that traditional statistical methods assume that predictor variables are uncorrelated with each other - incredible! Zubin wrote: > Can you be more specific on what the misleading statements are? A

Re: Data Mining blooper

2000-04-26 Thread Zubin
Can you be more specific on what the misleading statements are? And why you think they are misleading. T.S. Lim wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > While hunting for URLs for KDCentral.com, I encountered several > misleading statements about Statistics made by Data

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-26 Thread dennis roberts
At 07:57 AM 4/26/00 -0500, Herman Rubin wrote: >It does not surprise me one bit. The typical statistics >course teaches statistical methods and pronouncements, with >no attempt to achieve understanding. snip of more this is something i happen to agree with herman about ... but, it is a m

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-26 Thread Herman Rubin
In article <002601bfaf29$cfbaa9a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David A. Heiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >- Original Message - >From: T.S. Lim >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:49 AM >Subject: Data Mining blooper >> Whil

Re: Data Mining blooper and Related Subjects

2000-04-25 Thread David A. Heiser
- Original Message - From: T.S. Lim To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:49 AM Subject: Data Mining blooper > While hunting for URLs for KDCentral.com, I encountered several > misleading statements about Statistics made by Data Mining people. > I

Data Mining blooper

2000-04-25 Thread T.S. Lim
While hunting for URLs for KDCentral.com, I encountered several misleading statements about Statistics made by Data Mining people. I've posted 3 of them to my bulletin board. If you encounter other wrong remarks, I invite you to post them to the board too at http://www.recursive-partitioning.c