RE: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-14 Thread Eric Scharin
, method that should address everyone's concerns. - Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil W. Henry Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Reliability and baseball Replying to "R

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Aardvark Zymurgy
Rich: Next time you need access to the NY Times, try userid = opensesame with password = opensesame. No muss. No fuss. No spam. A.Z. On Wed, 13 Sep 2000 18:12:39 -0400, Rich Ulrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 13 Sep 2000 05:23:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan >Zaslavsky) wrote: > >>

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Rich Ulrich
On 13 Sep 2000 05:23:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Zaslavsky) wrote: > The following article may be of interest to some of you who are trying to > get across the notion of reliability, particularly those who are teaching > H.S. or young college students who have recently gone through high-sta

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Neil W. Henry
Replying to "Robert J. MacG. Dawson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wrote: It may be necessary to look into the way that the various states have set up their testing programs in order to appreciate the value of Rogosa's exercise. Here are some answers to questions you raise, which seem to me to be clea

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Radford Neal
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alan Zaslavsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The following article may be of interest to some of you who are trying to >get across the notion of reliability, particularly those who are teaching >H.S. or young college students who have recently gone through high-stake

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Bob Wheeler
There seems to be a lot of this sort of junk statistics in the popular press recently. The problem is, I think, that it gets picked up as justification for legislation or legal action. I doubt if there is much than can be done about it though. It might be interesting to ask students to critique

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread dennis roberts
but, this is why we don't use one item on a test ... we use not only multiple items on tests but, multiple tests ... this is why we don't use one course in college to decide whether we graduate a student or not ... we use 40/50 courses ... that's why we don't let someone graduate (in theory of c

Re: Reliability and baseball

2000-09-13 Thread Robert J. MacG. Dawson
Alan Zaslavsky wrote: > > The following article may be of interest to some of you who are trying to > get across the notion of reliability, particularly those who are teaching > H.S. or young college students who have recently gone through high-stakes > achievement/competency testing programs.