Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-26 Thread Mónica Giuliano
p HAVE DISTIBUTION BAYESIAN COMO FUNCTION BETA NO NECESARY NORMAL === This list is open to everyone. Occasionally, less thoughtful people send inappropriate messages. Please DO NOT COMPLAIN TO THE POSTMASTER about these

RE: Rates and proportions

2000-06-22 Thread Rodney Carr
21, 2000 5:28 PM To: Dale Berger Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Rates and proportions On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Dale Berger wrote: > If we observe one escape out of 1250 inmates, why can't we reliably > rule out zero as the population escape rate? Beca

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-22 Thread Bob Hayden
- Forwarded message from Robert Dawson - Again, a confidence interval may be useful (if not optimal) while including values that are obviously absurd. Examples are: the Z interval for proportion, in cases where the confidence level is greater than 98% and the np>=5 criterion is

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-22 Thread Robert Dawson
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Dale Berger wrote: > > > Yet, p=0 is a special case where an outcome is impossible. A > > reasonable confidence interval for p should not include zero if the > > outcome has been observed in a sample. Not so? and Donald Burrill replied: > I am unable to reconcile this

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-22 Thread Donald Burrill
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Dale Berger wrote: > Yet, p=0 is a special case where an outcome is impossible. A > reasonable confidence interval for p should not include zero if the > outcome has been observed in a sample. Not so? I am unable to reconcile this assertion with the fact that the only v

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-21 Thread Dale Berger
CTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 12:27 AM Subject: Re: Rates and proportions > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Dale Berger wrote: > > > If we observe one escape out of 1250 inmates, why can't we reliably > > rule out zero a

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-21 Thread Donald Burrill
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Dale Berger wrote: > If we observe one escape out of 1250 inmates, why can't we reliably > rule out zero as the population escape rate? Because k = 1 (for n = 1250) is not significantly different from k = 0. > The normal approximation to the binomial may not be appropria

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread Alan McLean
One might also ask what is meant by the 'population escape rate' in this context. Is the data not population data? Alan Dale Berger wrote: > > Hi Don et al., > > If we observe one escape out of 1250 inmates, why can't we reliably rule out > zero as the population escape rate? The normal appro

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread Dale Berger
treet Claremont, CA 91711 FAX: 909-621-8905 Phone: 909-621-8084 http://www.cgu.edu/faculty/bergerd.html - Original Message - From: Donald Burrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 2:49 PM Subject: Re: Rates

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread Donald Burrill
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, I "inherited" the reporting system for our escapes and have some > questions about how data has been reported in the past. > > First, I have a question about the formula used to calculate escape > rates which is (escapes)/(average daily popu

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread dennis roberts
>Reword these as per 10,000? That way you have "whole people" while >preserving the differences among the rates. this might ease the problem but, does not eliminate it (though makes more sense than a base of 100) ... for, what if the value comes out to be ... .04423? i guess it depends on how ma

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread Jill Binker
At 12:55 PM -0400 6/20/00, dennis roberts wrote: >At 11:10 AM 6/20/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Then I also have a rule of thumb question. At what point is a rate >>considered unreliable or a useless piece of information? My example again >>and remember that it uses the "formula" I first

Rates and proportionscc:Mail UUCPLINK 2.0 Undeliverable Message

2000-06-20 Thread Postmaster
7.71.151]) by docrs2.doc.state.ok.us (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP id AAA3436 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:11:29 -0500 Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Rates and proportions Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:10:00 -0500 Message-ID:

Re: Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread dennis roberts
At 11:10 AM 6/20/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Then I also have a rule of thumb question. At what point is a rate >considered unreliable or a useless piece of information? My example again >and remember that it uses the "formula" I first presented above. The >previous reports show rates o

Rates and proportions

2000-06-20 Thread fran . ferrari
Hello, I "inherited" the reporting system for our escapes and have some questions about how data has been reported in the past. First, I have a question about the formula used to calculate escape rates which is (escapes)/(average daily population - escapes). Then this is reported as a rate per 1