On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:14:39 -0500, Bruce Weaver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Rich Ulrich wrote:
[ snip, including earlier post ]
> > That ANOVA is inherently a 2-sided test. So is the traditional 2x2
> > contingency table. That is because, sides refer to hypotheses.
>
PLEASE FORWARD TO THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING
YOUR LASER PRINTER SUPPLIES
VORTEX SUPPLIES
-SPECIALS OF THE DAY ON LASER TONER SUPPLIES AT DISCOUNT PRICES--
LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES
COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES
WE ARE -->THE<-- PLACE TO BUY YOUR TONER CARTRIDGES BECAUSE
At 12:56 PM 3/25/01 -0500, Karl L. Wuensch wrote:
>Here is how I resolve that problem: Define the population from the sample,
>rather than vice versa -- that is, my results can be generalized to any
>population for which my sample could be reasonably considered to be a random
>sample. Maybe we c
Here is how I resolve that problem: Define the population from the sample,
rather than vice versa -- that is, my results can be generalized to any
population for which my sample could be reasonably considered to be a random
sample. Maybe we could call this "transcendental sampling" ;-) -- it is
