[Edu-sig] An OLPC comment

2007-01-17 Thread Arthur
Hate being the grunch. I hope the OLPC accomplishes everything it sets out to and more. What I suspect is that - having learnt something about complexity and dynamic systems from computers - that the most profound effects of the initiative will be unintended ones. Let's hope they are mostly

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment

2007-01-17 Thread Bert Freudenberg
Hi Art, if you are interested in a serious discussion with OLPC, rather than just about OLPC, their open forum might be a better place than Python edu-sig. See http://mailman.laptop.org/mailman/listinfo You might even get a response ;-) - Bert - Am Jan 17, 2007 um 15:15 schrieb Arthur:

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment

2007-01-17 Thread kirby urner
Grunch with a u is from Gander of Geese, saw some other funny ones, Oh drat sorry, meant Gaggle of Geese not Gander. This guy Haim (aka Zorro) on Math Forum always heckles me when I get that wrong. Here's an official government web page to help us out in the future:

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment

2007-01-17 Thread ajsiegel
- Original Message -From: kirby urner I'll leave it to Arthur to nail down his affiliation.I am not now, nor have I ever been.Art ___ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment

2007-01-17 Thread Ivan Krstić
Arthur wrote: Particularly given this, I don't understand the embedded need, as part of the process, to the compromise on some basic ideas - normally called science. [...] Or - maybe more what he was suggesting - is that until there is empricial evidence that leads us in a certain and

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment (Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools)

2007-01-17 Thread Paul D. Fernhout
Art- It is funny to see the learning just in case educators crying out for more testing just in case. Like the Albany Free School, or John Holt, or The Hole in the Wall project or various other success stories relating to learning on demand which the OLPC project supports did not exist. No

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment (Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools)

2007-01-17 Thread Arthur
Yes, Paul: School sucks. Any kid worth his salt knows that And yes Paul: The possibilities for meaningful testing are indeed limited. Are we influencing someone to be more or less creative, more or less independent, etc. Implicit in the design of any test is our values -i.e. for what are

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment (vs. Apprenticeship)

2007-01-17 Thread Paul D. Fernhout
Art- I think one issue is here is the difference between apprenticeship and teaching. Perhaps there is a middle position of mentoring between those too, as apprenticeship can often be exploitive, plus take many years. One of the best ways to learn a skill (like programming) might be to be

Re: [Edu-sig] An OLPC comment (Why Educational Technology Has Failed Schools)

2007-01-17 Thread Paul D. Fernhout
Laura- That's a good sentiment to use testing to see how we the tester is succeeding at communicating. I totally agree with the benefit to any presenter of feedback about whether the audience gets what they are trying to present. Refining presentations and presentation skills is important. On

[Edu-sig] Python.Camp

2007-01-17 Thread Jan Ulrich Hasecke
Hi all! I am deeply impressed by the profund discussions about OLPC. When I look at the equiment of an ordinary school in Germany, it would be nice if UNESCO would give all pupils a low cost notebook with python installed to have a decent possibility to learn programming. ;-) A week ago I