On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:00 PM, DiPierro, Massimo
wrote:
> Mind that my opinion is biased since I am the author of web2py.
<< snip >>
> I will be happy to answer more specific questions on the topic but I am in
> India for a physics conference and have limited connectivity. I have to be
> con
__
From: edu-sig-bounces+mdipierro=cs.depaul@python.org
[edu-sig-bounces+mdipierro=cs.depaul@python.org] On Behalf Of David
MacQuigg [macqu...@ece.arizona.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:17 PM
To: edu-sig@python.org
Subject: [Edu-sig] Django or Web2Py for PyWhip
Since we are
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:23 PM, David MacQuigg
wrote:
> kirby urner wrote:
>>
>> At issue is whether try-over-the-web is a way you need to go, granted
>> other language communities are trying it.
>>
>> You've got Python out of the box if you're a Linux user, and so the
>> question is, if you're n
kirby urner wrote:
At issue is whether try-over-the-web is a way you need to go, granted
other language communities are trying it.
You've got Python out of the box if you're a Linux user, and so the
question is, if you're not a Linux user, do you even matter? When it
comes to server side archit
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:17 PM, David MacQuigg
wrote:
> Since we are changing the name of the project from PyWhip to (PyKata,
> PyPractice, PyJet, ???), now might be a good time to reconsider some other
> basic choices. App Engine seems to be the right choice for the server
> foundation. Anyon
Since we are changing the name of the project from PyWhip to (PyKata,
PyPractice, PyJet, ???), now might be a good time to reconsider some
other basic choices. App Engine seems to be the right choice for the
server foundation. Anyone who has tried to develop a web app with
modpython will appr
